The Purpose of Our Existence and Journey in This World?

 

This morning, I went to Kuala Hospital for my regular twice a week leg dressing. While waiting I was talking to some of the nurses there on life, I asked one of the senior nurses what is the purpose of life here in this world. The nurse, being a Muslim, told me from the Islamic point of view, our purpose here is to pray and worship Allah 5 times a day. That may not be too practical if we are driving or busy at work, but fair enough. I then asked him what about the animals that do not pray and yet they live happily in the wild, flying about and creeping everywhere and being freely fed by God or Nature. He told me animals cannot think like us.

Then I thought to myself if animals cannot think, pray and worship, then why did God create them? But I did not ask him for the answer. For this, we next need to ask whether we, including the rest of the animals, were created by God or naturally evolved and selected through millions of years of evolution? But let’s not discuss too much on biological evolution here, but just briefly mention this later as we go along.  

Let us only discuss the reasons for our temporary existence here in this world. But, first, let us look at our lifespan of a maximum of 120 years here. Let me summarize our existence in point form here:

How long can we live in this world? 10, 40, 60, 80. 100 or 120 years? Let’s have a look:

If the Age of the Universe determined at 20 billion years were to be telescoped into a 24-hour day, then the maximum life span of a human of 120 years will exist for only (24 x 60 x 60) seconds / 20 billion x 120 = 5.184 x 10 ^-4 second or 0.0005184 of a second

1.     The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away (Psalm 90:10).

2.     Whereas you know not what shall be tomorrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapor that appears for a little time, and then vanishes away (James 4:14).

3.       With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day (2 Peter 3:8).

 4.     All the world's a stage,

And all the men and women merely players:

They have their exits and their entrances 

(As You Like It: William Shakespeare)

 

The purpose of our life is a deeply philosophical question that has been contemplated by thinkers, theologians, scientists, and individuals throughout history. Different perspectives offer various interpretations:

First, we have religious and spiritual perspectives. Many religions propose that the purpose of life is to serve and worship a higher power, to follow divine commandments, and to prepare for an afterlife. For example, in Christianity, the purpose of life is to know, love, and serve God. In Buddhism, it is to attain enlightenment and escape the cycle of suffering and rebirth

Many religions view earthly life as a preparation for an eternal afterlife. The limited lifespan is seen as a time for spiritual growth, learning, and testing. For example, in Christianity, the brevity of life underscores the importance of living according to God's will to achieve eternal life in heaven.

Some spiritual traditions, like Buddhism and Hinduism, see life as part of a larger cycle of rebirths, where actions in this life affect future existences.

Second, we also have the philosophical perspectives such as existentialism, as articulated by philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, suggests that life has no inherent meaning, and it is up to individuals to create their own purpose through choices and actions. Then Nihilism argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value, whereas humanism emphasizes the importance of human values and the pursuit of knowledge, happiness, and self-fulfilment.

Third, we also have people who look at life from philosophical perspectives. They think that existentialism posits that the finite nature of life gives urgency and significance to our choices. Knowing that life is limited can motivate individuals to live authentically and make meaningful decisions. Absurdism, as discussed by Albert Camus, suggests embracing the absurdity of life and finding personal meaning despite the lack of inherent purpose. Whereas stoicism encourages focusing on what we can control, accepting our mortality, and living virtuously.

Scientists may look at the purpose of life from their scientific perspectives. From their evolutionary standpoint, the purpose of life can be seen as the survival and reproduction of species. Richard Dawkins, in "The Selfish Gene," argues that the purpose of life is to ensure the survival of genes. Biological perspectives focus on the functioning and perpetuation of life through processes like metabolism, growth, and reproduction. From an evolutionary biology viewpoint, the limited lifespan is natural and reflects the lifecycle of organisms. Purpose, in this context, might be framed around survival, reproduction, and ensuring the continuation of the species. Advances in medicine and technology continually push the boundaries of human longevity, prompting ongoing exploration of how we can maximize the quality of life within our limited years. But there are also personal reasons for the purpose of life here in this world. Many people find purpose through personal fulfilment, relationships, love, creativity, and contributing to the well-being of others and society. Viktor Frankl, in his book "Man's Search for Meaning," for example, emphasizes that finding meaning is crucial for human existence, and this meaning can be discovered through work, love, and suffering.

Ultimately, the purpose of life is subjective and can vary greatly depending on one's beliefs, values, experiences, and worldview. Some people find purpose through faith and spirituality, others through philosophy and reason, and still others through personal goals and connections with others. The diversity of answers reflects the complexity and richness of human existence. I think the awareness of mortality can inspire individuals to prioritize meaningful activities, relationships, and experiences. The recognition that time is limited often leads to a greater appreciation for life’s moments and a focus on achieving personal goals and happiness. Viktor Frankl's logotherapy emphasizes finding meaning even in suffering and recognizing that life's finitude can lend urgency to creating and discovering purpose.

Of course, there are also cultural and societal beliefs. Many cultures place high value on leaving a legacy, whether through children, achievements, contributions to knowledge, or societal impacts. Knowing that life is limited can motivate individuals to make lasting contributions that endure beyond their lifespan. Societal structures often emphasize the importance of certain life stages—education, career, family, and retirement—reflecting a cultural approach to making the most of one's finite years.

Ultimately, the limited duration of human life challenges individuals to find purpose and meaning within a bounded timeframe. This limitation often amplifies the significance of our actions, choices, and relationships, encouraging us to seek fulfilment, make impactful contributions, and cherish our experiences.

No matter how we try to argue and discuss this purpose of our life here, we have to accept that the finite nature of human life, typically maxing out around 100 years, adds a poignant dimension to the question of life's purpose. 

Some look at ways in which different perspectives address this temporal limitation. For instance, some may invest in 10 houses, have 20 cars and other material investments all over the place knowing well they can only live a maximum of 100 years before they are forced to release all they have on death. First of all, how is it possible to stay in 10 houses and drive 20 cars at the same time? Don't we think this is very foolish carrying unnecessary burdens in our lives having to unnecessarily maintain them, worse still when we get older and older when we are riddled with illnesses, and even if we don't, we still get weaker and weaker as we gradually age. By then we have neither the energy, strength, nor interest in maintaining them anymore knowing well we cannot carry them to the grave. On the moment of death, we instantly must (have to) leave everything – status, titles, wealth and everything we have gained and collected in our short 100 years of life. We return to dust from where we came. Everything comes to an absolute naught for us, that is, if we are lucky. For most souls they may not be that lucky. They may need to pay for all they have enjoyed here in this world. 

On death all that we had, name, fame, titles, status, wealth...etc, crumbled into dust. We will be left out and forgotten even by our closest relatives. At best they may miss and remember us for less than a year. Their generations would not care or know who were. Our souls too will leave empty handed. Let this be our reminder.  

We are a painter of our own souls here in the next world. See here:

The Soul as An Artist in the Next World

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-soul-as-artist-in-next-world.html

This question touches on important aspects of materialism, the pursuit of wealth, and the finite nature of life. Here are several perspectives on why some people accumulate extensive material possessions and whether this aligns with a meaningful life. There are social and psychological factors.

See also my personal experiences hoarding unnecessary things that nobody came to admire here:

Carrying Unnecessary Burdens in our Short Life

 https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/search?q=my+experience+in+life

I remember when I was a student in India where people there were very poor. I remember winter in central India can be very cold. I remember young street boys and girls in the street begging me for money in the heart of winter. They must be very hungry. As a student I do not have much money to give. But I have food and a fairly warm hostel to stay in and a bed to sleep. I took compassion on them. I often gave them whatever I could afford. You can never understand or feel the joy, peace and warmth in my heart I had when I returned to my hostel bed to sleep for the night thinking about them. I knew they were still cold out there in the streets with torn thin clothes on them, but at least they would not be hungry for that night. I knew I could not do much as a student. But that was my best. The joy of giving and sharing with those who were poorer than me was an immense reward for me no money could ever buy. There was immense peace, joy and happiness in my heart, more importantly for my inner soul. You cannot never understand this inner feeling of mine.   

 Unfortunately, most people consider status and identity first. For many, owning multiple properties and luxury cars is a symbol of success, status, and identity caring two hoots for others. They think these possessions will bring them social recognition and a sense of achievement. Second, they feel the sense of security and control. To them material wealth can provide a sense of security and control over one's environment. It offers financial stability and the ability to cope with unforeseen circumstances. Unfortunately, the under privileged too, care two hoots for the rich and mighty.

Third, there is this hedonism in which the pursuit of pleasure and enjoyment drives some people to acquire luxury items. The joy derived from new possessions can be a significant motivator. Fourth, there is this economic and investment reasons where wealth accumulation like real estate and luxury items can be seen as investments. Properties can appreciate in value, and assets like cars can be part of a larger portfolio aimed at wealth generation. But I think wealthy individuals often diversify their investments to minimize risk. Owning multiple properties and high-value items can be part of a broader strategy to preserve and grow wealth.

The pursuit of material wealth can be seen as a way to create purpose in life. However, many philosophies and spiritual traditions argue that true fulfilment comes from non-material sources, such as relationships, personal growth, and contributions to society. Movements like minimalism and simplicity in life advocate for the reduction of possessions to focus on what truly matters. This philosophy suggests that excessive material accumulation can indeed be a burden rather than a source of happiness.

However, from the practical considerations of maintenance and burden to our short lives, managing multiple properties and possessions can become a significant burden, especially as one ages. The upkeep, maintenance, and management of these assets require time, energy, and resources. Aging and declining health is a must that comes naturally whether or not we like them.  With aging comes a natural decline in physical strength and health, which can make it challenging to enjoy or maintain multiple properties and luxury items. We need to think of legacy and altruism as time passes.

Some people accumulate wealth and possessions to leave a legacy for their descendants. They may find purpose in ensuring their family’s financial stability and success. Wealth can also enable significant philanthropic efforts. Many wealthy individuals find purpose in giving back to society, supporting charitable causes, and funding initiatives that benefit others.

Some believe accumulating extensive material wealth can provide security, status, and temporary pleasure, it often comes with significant maintenance burdens and may not lead to long-term fulfilment. Philosophical and spiritual traditions, as well as modern movements like minimalism, suggest that true happiness and purpose are more likely found in relationships, personal growth, and contributions to the well-being of others. Ultimately, the value and purpose of material wealth are subjective and vary greatly depending on individual values and life goals.

However, having discussed all these reasons I believe it is far better to enrich and invest in our souls as an artist of our lives while we are still here. We still have an opportunity.  We all have a soul that does not die. It remains for all eternity in the next world. I believe this is the best investment to secure us life for all eternity rather than gathering temporary material wealth here in this world. I believe the idea of investing in one’s soul rather than in material possessions resonates deeply with many religious, spiritual, and philosophical traditions. Here are some perspectives on why focusing on the enrichment of the soul might be seen as more meaningful and beneficial. First there are religious and spiritual beliefs in many religions, such as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, that emphasize the eternal nature of the soul and the transient nature of earthly life. Investing in the soul is seen as preparing for an eternal afterlife, which holds greater significance than temporary material possessions. There is also the moral and ethical aspect.  Spiritual traditions often promote values such as compassion, kindness, humility, and selflessness. Living by these principles enriches the soul and aligns with a sense of divine purpose. Spiritual growth and enlightenment through prayers and worship, meditation, and reflection are aimed at spiritual growth and enlightenment. These practices foster inner peace, wisdom, and a deeper understanding of life’s purpose. They are meaningful.  Philosophers like Socrates and Aristotle have argued that true happiness and fulfilment come from cultivating virtues and wisdom, rather than accumulating material wealth. Existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Viktor Frankl emphasize the importance of finding personal meaning and living authentically. This often involves prioritizing inner values and self-actualization over external possessions. There is also mental and emotional health and psychological well-being. Focusing on personal growth, relationships, and meaningful activities tends to contribute more to long-term well-being and happiness than material wealth. Studies show that experiences and personal development often lead to greater satisfaction than acquiring possessions. There is also a reduction of stress.  A life less burdened by the maintenance of numerous material goods can be simpler and less stressful. Simplifying life can lead to greater clarity and focus on what truly matters. Investing in the soul often leads to actions that positively impact others, such as kindness, generosity, and support. These actions can create a lasting legacy and ripple effect that outlives one’s earthly existence.  Focusing on the soul encourages living according to higher ethical standards, which can contribute to a more just and compassionate society. Perhaps we need to integrate both worlds. A balanced approach for material possessions is necessary to some extent for a comfortable life, a balanced approach that prioritizes spiritual and personal growth can lead to a more holistic and fulfilling life. Material wealth can be used as a tool for positive impact when aligned with higher values.

Investing in the soul aligns with the belief in the eternal nature of the soul and the transient nature of material life. This perspective encourages a focus on spiritual growth, ethical living, and personal fulfilment, which can lead to a more meaningful and satisfying existence. While material possessions have their place, they should not overshadow the deeper purpose of enriching the soul and preparing for what many believe to be an eternal journey.

Having discussed all that, I think all we need is just food and water which are the most important, a shelter, room or a simple house somewhere to stay, a bathroom with a tap or water supply to bathe, a toilet to ease ourselves, and a pail with soap to wash our daily clothes, somewhere to hang up the clothes to dry, and just a corner in the house to sleep. It need not necessarily be a bed. A corner in the house with a thin mattress or mat on the floor will do, and a pillow over our heads, and a sheet of cloth as a blanket to keep warm. And of course, freedom to move about and go anywhere we like birds in the air, and butterflies fluttering from flower to flower.

Consider, none of the animals out there require any of these except food and water, and yet they all managed to live till the end of their life spans God endowed in them through their genes. Why can’t humans do the same, live as simply as possible so that we need not carry unnecessary burdens in our lives, having to clean, dust and maintain them when none of these things we acquire add a single hair or an extra beat of our hearts. Furthermore, none of those wealth or unnecessary burdens we carry along is going to gain admiration from any person. They don’t even bother or even want to look at what material properties we carry along. They have their own lives to live. Don’t we think we are very foolish to carry and maintain unnecessary material burdens in our lives when the only thing we need is just food, water, shelter and clothes

My answer and thinking aligns with a minimalist and ascetic philosophy that advocates for simplicity and focusing on what is essential for a fulfilling life. Here are several key points that support my viewpoint. Minimalist philosophy emphasizes reducing possessions to what is essential, which can lead to greater clarity, focus, and freedom. By removing unnecessary material burdens, individuals can concentrate on experiences, relationships, and personal growth. There is also the benefit of mental and emotional well-being because living simply can reduce stress and anxiety associated with maintaining and protecting material possessions. It can also foster a sense of contentment and gratitude for the basic necessities. This simplicity is sustainable living that has an impact on the environment.  A simpler lifestyle reduces consumption and waste, which is beneficial for the environment. It aligns with sustainable living principles by minimizing one's ecological footprint. Using fewer resources allows for more equitable distribution of essentials like food, water, and shelter, potentially contributing to global well-being. There are also these spiritual and ethical considerations.  Many spiritual traditions advocate for simplicity and detachment from material possessions as a path to spiritual enlightenment and inner peace. This approach encourages focusing on inner values and the well-being of others. Living with less can be an ethical choice, reflecting values such as humility, generosity, and respect for all living beings.

I think there are also practical benefits in simple living. There is less maintenance. Fewer possessions mean less time and effort spent on cleaning, organizing, and maintaining items. This can free up time for more meaningful activities. There is also financial freedom by reducing unnecessary expenses allows for greater financial freedom and the ability to allocate resources towards experiences and goals that matter most.

Let us compare ourselves, zoologically speaking we too are an animal with other lower animals. They live naturally. Observing animals, which live without the burdens of material possessions, can inspire a return to a more natural, unencumbered way of life. Animals focus on basic needs and are often seen as content and well-adapted to their environments. But for us we have challenges and counterpoints.

First, we have societal expectations. Society often values material success and equates it with status and achievement. Choosing a minimalist lifestyle might require resisting societal pressures and norms. Then we are faced with economic realities. While a simple lifestyle is appealing, practical realities such as job requirements, family responsibilities, and health needs can complicate the implementation of such a lifestyle for everyone. Individual preferences are another reason.  Some people find joy and fulfilment in collecting items, hobbies, and activities that involve material possessions. What is considered unnecessary for one person might be meaningful for another. Whatever our reasons, to me there is no point of having status in life when at most we can only live up to 100 years only to die along with our status and properties we accumulated that burdens us. I emphasize the transient nature of life and challenges the value of pursuing status and accumulating material possessions. Here are some reasons why focusing on status and material wealth might be seen as futile, and why a simpler, more meaningful approach to life could be more fulfilling. Impermanence of material wealth means temporary ownership.  Material possessions and status are temporary. When we die, we cannot take these things with us, making the relentless pursuit of them seem ultimately pointless. Accumulating and maintaining material wealth often requires significant time, effort, and resources, which can lead to stress and detract from more meaningful activities. We cannot find true sources of fulfilment. However, research and anecdotal evidence suggest that relationships, experiences, and personal growth contribute more to long-term happiness and fulfilment than material possessions. What about inner peace and contentment?  Living simply and focusing on inner values can lead to greater contentment and peace of mind, as opposed to the often-fleeting satisfaction of acquiring status and wealth.  Many spiritual traditions advocate for detachment from material possessions as a way to achieve spiritual growth and enlightenment.

What do you think? Please share your thoughts with us to enrich your spiritual wealth and spiritual well-being. Altruism, not selfishness, saves our souls for all eternity in the next world. 

Just remember, our soul is the most important part of our body. It is not our brain, heart, lungs, kidneys, etc. Cherish it and invest on it. It lives on.