I had wanted this morning to write
a good, lengthy and detailed article on the assessment of nutritional status. This
is one of my areas of specializations besides science, medicine, food quality
control, astronomy, toxicology, forensic science, and evolutionary biology.
Then I found a paper published by
Aditi Kesari and Julia Y. Noel. They have already briefly done this in the
link below:
Nevertheless, to summarize in note
and point form, the assessment of nutritional status is not merely conducting
some clinical examinations followed by some lab tests, and radiological imaging
on a person or in a population as doctors normally do. It is not so easy as
that as most malnutrition is sub-clinical, and they don’t show up on any
clinical examination.
Neither is nutrition all about what
food is good or bad for health, nor it is about what food is rich in
carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, minerals, carbohydrates, cholesterol
or sugars or salt. Neither is nutrition all about which food is high in
cholesterol, causes diabetes, cancer or heart disease, stroke or various kinds
of diseases, or about which food to avoid or to take, or which food is toxic,
others are ‘healthy’. I am afraid nutrition is far, far, far more than
what most people are interested in and talk about most.
Nor is nutrition all about chemistry and the chemical composition of foods, or about diseases related to nutrition, diet and eating. Nor is it all about slimming programme and how to reduce weight. Those are what most people in the public talk about.
Nutrition is far, far, more
elaborate and complex than these questions people ask all the time. Furthermore, as nutritionists and clinicians,
we are fully qualified through our years postgraduate training up to master’s
and doctorate degree levels that there is no way to find out if an individual
or a population suffers from malnutrition since most of malnutrition are
sub-clinical and does not show any kind of signs or symptoms by mere clinical
examination no matter how elaborate, extensive or advanced our clinical
examinations.
The diagnosis of subclinical
malnutrition is far, far beyond the skills, training and experience of any
single doctor. It requires a team of medical and scientific experts working
together in coordination using their best expertise to make an assessment, unless
an individual suffers from very severe nutritional diseases where some of the
signs, symptoms and other presentations show up clearly. I have very briefly
written some of these clinical signs and syndromes of nutritional deficiency
diseases. It was merely casual side notes under the title:
The Diagnosis for Diabetes
Mellitus: New vs Old Methods in Real Life or Hospitalized Situations below this
link:
https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2023/05/the-diagnosis-for-diabetes-mellitus-new_29.html
To summarize what nutritionists do
when they conduct a nutritional assessment in a population (rather than on any
individual), here are some of the criteria they examine, very briefly written
in point form below:
1.
Clinical examination
2.
Anthropometric measurements like heights, weight, skin-fold thickness, skull,
abdomen, hip sizes.
3.
Radiological examination for bone densities if necessary
4.
Laboratory examinations including saturation or loading tests for vitamin
deficiencies.
5.
Food consumption studies
6.
Chemical analysis of food consumed from randomized food samples taken
7.
Food taboos studies
8.
Socio-economic factors, religious or other taboos influencing food intake.
9.
Agricultural and food production including soil science.
10. Epidemiological
studies on disease patterns within a community
11. Re-evaluation as
follow-up studies within 5 years of study
We would not go into the details of
the above as we ourselves have to undergo an additional and intensive 5 more
years of postgraduate training meant for doctors, biomedical scientists or
nutritionists after graduation. Just a very, very brief point-form summary
above for awareness will do.
The above are professional training
and the job of a nutritionist or a clinician specializing in nutrition. It
takes about 10 years to become a qualified and licensed nutritionist before he
/ she can practise nutrition in Malaysia. It is a licensed profession
like dietetics.
Lim ju boo
2 comments:
What an eye-opeaner. Most people think that nutrition is all about which food is healthy and which ones are harmful to consume. Truly we did expect the expertise of a nutritionist is far beyond what food to take for good health and which food to avoid.
Even the most complicated medical investigation dioes not beyoond the lab We didn't even think there is such a study like nutrition survey, let alone how complicated it is
Thanks Dr Lim
I am a doctor who was involved in one of the nutrition surveys in the Philipinnes over 25 years ago and I can understand the amount of coordinated team work afford by so many medical and scientific experts put together. I fully agree with you a lot of people suffers from either undernutrition or over nutrition, put together in one word as malnutrition or bad (mal)nutrition. I agree most malnurtion do not show up clinically unlike other diseases. Hence doctors miss all of them out completely. Thus, a far more collecive investigations such as food consumption survey, weights and weights, anthropometry measurements are required. I read with interest all you describe there even though you said was a 'summary'
Post a Comment