Thursday, September 23, 2010

My skill with the violin

Dear SK, and all,

Please do not give the impression to others that I am an expert violinist. I am NOT. The violin dubbed as the King of Instruments is exceedingly difficult to play. You need to start learning it at a tender age of 4-6 years old, and continue with it until you are a teenager and older. You need to put many hours of practice into it before you can handle classical concert pieces.

I am not. I picked up the violin not at a age of 6, but at 60 and I am still learning it with many bowing techniques where I am still yet to master. It is very difficult at my age. I need to read the notes and practice on the difficult passages repeatedly first before playing the full score.

I can play almost all light classical pieces without much difficulty but not those violin concertos which are far too difficult for me. These are normally handled by celebrated professional concert violinists where they learn from young for another 10 -15 years.

Playing the violin is a life-long learning, and I am not suited for that since I took it up as a hobby 5 yerars after my retirement.

There is much for me to learn

jb lim

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Tan Seng Khoon ++ wrote:


Dear JB,

I admire your great talent and interest in music and also your expertise in playing the violin.

I am a music moron. But I can play the guitar a little. Also a bit of the drum. Hope to pick up more next year.

Rgds,
Khoon.


----- Original Message -----
From: Ir T O Lau
To: JB Lim
Cc: Tan Seng Khoon ; Pastor David ; Magdalene Lim ; Josephine Wong ; Joseph Ng Moo Eng ; Hon Too Fang ; C K Cheong
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:22 PM
Subject: Toselli's Serenade -- Soothing Music


Dear Dr JB,

Thanks so much for the enlightenment about the music.....this goes to prove your extraordinary versatility, i.e. an artist and a scientist at the same time (that I knew it already after reading many of your emails in the past).

I'm only too privileged and delighted to be a friend of yours whom you would unselfishly pass on your invaluable knowledge!

The youtube music played by Andre Rieu is really very nice and soothing to the mind and soul. Totally enjoyed it.

Cheers,

T O Lau

P/s: I notice that you didn't copy your mail to other e-buddies. Hope you wouldn't mind my doing so to let them know about the music.

A Poem for Moon-cake Festival (一个月饼节的诗) :

Dear Dr Lim,

You are so wonderful, so full of talent, Nothing seem to be
difficult to you. How I wish I could be just 10% of your capability...


Thank you & Warmest regards
C K Cheong


On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:53 PM, JB Lim wrote:

Dear friends,

I have penned a Mid-Autumn Festival poem for you and your family.

I hope you like it. Just click below to open

Best wishes for Moon-cake Festival & regards

http://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2010/09/poem-for-moon-cake-festival.html

jb lim

Toselli's Serenade

Ir T O Lau to me, Tan, Pastor, Magdalene, Josephine, Joseph, Hon, C
show details 10:22 PM (1 hour ago)

Dear Dr JB,

Thanks so much for the enlightenment about the music.....this goes to prove your extraordinary versatility, i.e. an artist and a scientist at the same time (that I knew it already after reading many of your emails in the past).

I'm only too privileged and delighted to be a friend of yours whom you would unselfishly pass on your invaluable knowledge!

The youtube music played by Andre Rieu is really very nice and soothing to the mind and soul. Totally enjoyed it.

Cheers,

T O Lau

P/s: I notice that you didn't copy your mail to other e-buddies. Hope you wouldn't mind my doing so to let them know about the music.

----- Original Message -----
From: JB Lim
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 8:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: JUST TOO BEAUTIFUL NOT TO SHARE


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JB Lim
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: JUST TOO BEAUTIFUL NOT TO SHARE
To: Tai Onn Lau


Dear Ir. Lau,

Thanks for those lovely slides of roses and the beautiful accompanying music. I enjoyed it.

This is to let you know that the actual name of that music composition is called Toselli’s Serenade and not Nightingale Serenade as given in the first slide. It was probably mistaken as a nightingale serenade because of a nightingale chipping beautifully in the background. That’s wrong. We need to give credit to the name of the actual composer.

This piece was composed by Italian pianist and composer Enrico Toselli who was born and died in Florence, Italy (March 13, 1883 Florence-January 15, 1926). Although Toselli studied the piano with Giovanni Sgambati and composition with Giuseppe Martucci and Reginaldo Grazzini he started on a brilliant career as a concert pianist at an early age in Italy.

Toselli also composed many works for the violin, one of which is this Enrico Toselli serenata which is probably the most well-known. Technically, for us who study music, this composition is actually called Serenata 'Rimpianto' Op.6 No.1

Toselli also wrote two operettas, La cattiva Francesca in 1912, and La principessa bizzarra in 1913.

Serenata Rimpianto is one of my favourite classical pieces which I knew every since a child. Even today, I still play this piece on my violin now and then on request from friends and at functions as a solist, accompanied on a piano. I have also played it with an orchestra. It requires a lot of expression and feelings especially with the bowing when played on a violin
You may listen to this piece played once again by Andre Rieu, a Dutch violinist, conductor, and composer best known for his the waltz-playing "Johann Strauss Orchestra".
Click below. Happy listening
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkguCwO5i-M


jb lim
Music Student (violin)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tai Onn Lau
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM
Subject: JUST TOO BEAUTIFUL
To:








JUST TOO BEAUTIFUL NOT TO SHARE WITH YOU............



https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/12b3c92805fc0c4a

A Poem for Moon-cake Festival (一个月饼节的诗) :

A Poem for Moon-cake Festival:
一个月饼节的诗:

A Mid-Autumn Dream
一个中秋梦

Think of an ancient village
想想一古村落

On a lonely night
在一个孤独的夜晚

In bygone days of early China
在早期中国往日

Nestled in a valley among hills
坐落在一个山谷之间的丘陵

As Mother Nature has it
正如大自然有它

A lonely river through the village
一个孤独的河穿过村庄

Avenue with weeping willow tress
大街上垂柳枝条

Running crystal clear waters in moonlight
运行在月光清澈

Meandering its course down
蜿蜒的课程下来

The hills and valleys below
以下的丘陵和山谷

In moonlight and in tranquility
在月光下与安宁

On a mid autumn night
在一个中秋夜

Conjure up the bright Full Moon above
想起了上面的明亮的圆月

On a mid autumn night
在一个中秋夜

Her cool radiance shines
她的寒光闪耀

Over mountains and valleys
在高山和峡谷

The village and placid streams
平静的村庄和溪流

In the stillness of the night
在寂静的夜晚

On a breezy mid autumn night
在一个凉风习习中秋夜

Crystal clear, bright, solitary her light
清澈,明亮,孤独的她的光芒

Dreamy and romantic
梦幻和浪漫

Small children gazing at the Moon
在赏月小的孩子

Red lanterns, moon cakes they carry
大红灯笼,他们携带月饼

Through the village in solitude
通过在村庄孤独

Come, Mid-Autumn Moon Festival
来吧,中秋中秋

Enchanting and captivating
迷人魅力

How placid and tranquil life would be
如何平静和安宁的生活会

Prescribed in Chinese traditions
在中国传统的订明

Ordained by ancient customs and cultures
晋铎的古老的习俗和文化

This vision I cherish
我珍惜这一设想

In dreams by night
夜间在梦中

A thousand years be a night
一千年是一个夜晚

Blissful and enthralling
德佑和迷人

In quietude I surmise
在宁静我猜测

Come autumn be my bride
秋天来成为我的新娘

On a mid-autumn night
在一个中秋夜

Be betrothed in romance
许配浪漫

A Moon a-shining in glory
月亮照在荣耀

The moon cake awaiting
月饼等待

I yearn to gaze and eat
我渴望的目光和吃

By a river in moonlight
由一个在月光河

In an ancient village
在一个古老的村庄

Pretty lanterns and willow trees
漂亮的灯笼和柳树

Boulevard the waters
大道水域

Romantic and enchanting
浪漫和迷人

At last, vision is but a vapor
最后,视觉只不过是水蒸气

That vanishes by the break of the day
这消失的一天休息

Yet, this dream, my hope
然而,这个梦,我的希望

My desire, my wish
我的愿望,我的愿望

A Joyful Moon Cake Festival
欢乐的月饼节

Before moonset for another day
另一天月落之前

This, is my earnest wish for you
这是我对你的殷切希望

- lim ju boo 林 如 武 (Lin Ru Wu)

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

A Poem for Moon-cake Festival

Dear friends,

I have penned a Mid-Autumn Festival poem for you and your family. I thought since Moon-cake Festival is a Chinese festival seeped in tradition, it would best for me to write them in Chinese instead of in English. So I decided to translate my poem into Chinese which is just below each English verse.

But since some Chinese are English educated like myself, they may not know how to read Chinese characters, I have also translated the characters into Romanized Chinese (pinyin) so that even English educated friends can read the Romanized version.

Unfortunately, Chinese is a tonal language, and with Mandarin Chinese, it is based on 4 tones, plus a neutral tone. But I am unable to type these 4 tonal strokes to indicate how they should be pronounced (the pitch) since Microsoft word does not support pinyin. So you need to guess a bit, especially if you have not studied Chinese language (Mandarin) before.

I hope I have translated my poem originally composed in English correctly into Chinese. Having done that, I have to translate them again into pinyin to indicate how they should sound (pronounced) in English. Thus it was quite a task for me since I was English educated, and have never studied Chinese before.

I am not fluent in Chinese language myself having only learnt Mandarin only at the age of 69 (I am now 71) which I taught myself entirely without a teacher. This was long after my retirement from Civil Service in 1994. It was just two years ago (2008) that I decided to learn Mandarin as part of my life-long education.

This is the same position when I started to learn to play the violin at the age of 67 while others start to learn it at the age 6. But now I can play almost all classical composition for the violin except violin concertos. But it can be done. It is a matter of putting 6-10 hours a day in violin practice for another 6 months. It is a matter of determination, and willingness to learn no matter what age.

Having given the reasons above, you need to excuse me if I make mistakes with my Mandarin translation.

I hope you like my poem.

Best wishes for Moon-cake Festival & regards

jb lim

A Poem for Moon-cake Festival:
一个月饼节的诗:
yi ge yue bing de shi

A Mid-Autumn Dream
一个中秋梦
yi ge zhong qiu jie

In an ancient village
在一个古老的村庄
zai yi ge gu lao de chun zhuang

On a lonely night
在一个孤独的夜晚
zai yi ge gu du de ye wan

In bygone days of early China
在早期中国往日
zai zao qi zhong guo wang ri

Nestled in a valley among hills
坐落在一个山谷之间的丘陵
zhuo luo zai yi ge shan gu zhi jian de qiu ling

As Mother Nature has it
正如大自然有它
zhen ru da zhi ran you da

A lonely river through the village
一个孤独的河穿过村庄
yi ge gu du de he chuan guo chun zhuang

Avenue with weeping willow tress
大街上垂柳枝条
Da jie shang chui liu zhi tiao

Running crystal clear waters in moonlight
运行在月光清澈
Yun xing zai yue guang qing che

Meandering its course down
蜿蜒的课程下来
Wan yan de ke xhen xia lai

The hills and valleys below
以下的丘陵和山谷
Yi xia de qiu ling ge shan gu

In moonlight and in tranquility
在月光下与安宁
Zai yue guang xia yu an ning

On a mid autumn night
在一个中秋夜
Zai yi ge zhong qiu ye

Conjure up the bright Full Moon above
想起了上面的明亮的圆月
Xiang qi le shang mian de ming guang de yuan yue

On a mid autumn night
在一个中秋夜
Zai yi ge zhong qiu ye

Her cool radiance shines
她的寒光闪耀
Ta de han guang shan yao

Over mountains and valleys
在高山和峡谷
Zai gao shan he xia gu

The village and placid streams
平静的村庄和溪流
Ping jing de chun zhuang he xi liu

In the stillness of the night
在寂静的夜晚
Zai ji jing de ye wan

On a breezy mid autumn night
在一个凉风习习中秋夜
Zai yi ge liang feng xi xi zhong qiu ye

Crystal clear, bright, solitary her light
清澈,明亮,孤独的她的光芒
Qing che, ming liang, gu du de ta de guang mang

Dreamy and romantic
梦幻和浪漫
Meng huan he lang man

Small children gazing at the Moon
在赏月的小孩子
Zai shang yue de xiao hai zi

Red lanterns, moon cakes they carry
大红灯笼,他们携带月饼
Da hong deng long, ta men xie tai yue bing

Through the village in solitude
通过在村庄孤独
Tong guo de chun zhuang gu du

Come, Mid-Autumn Moon Festival
来吧,中秋中秋
Lai ba, zhong qiu zhong qiu

Enchanting and captivating
迷人魅力
Mi ren mei li

How placid and tranquil life would be
如何平静和安宁的生活会
Ru he ping jing he an ning de shen huo hui

Prescribed in Chinese traditions
在中国传统的订明
Zai zhong guo chuan tong de ding ming

Ordained by ancient customs and cultures
晋铎的古老的习俗和文化
Jin duo de gu lao de xi su he wen hua

This vision I cherish
我珍惜这一设想
Wo zhen xi zhe yi she xiang

In dreams by night
夜间在梦中
Ye jian de meng zhong

A thousand years be a night
一千年是一个夜晚
Yi qian nian shi yi ge ye wan

Blissful and enthralling
德佑和迷人
De you he mi ren

In quietude I surmise
在宁静我猜测
Zai ning jing wo cai che

Come autumn be my bride
秋天来成为我的新娘
Qiu tian laic hen wei wo de xin liang

On a mid-autumn night
在一个中秋夜
Zai yi ge zhong qiu ye

Be betrothed in romance
许配浪漫
Xu pei lang man

A Moon a-shining in glory
月亮荣耀的照映
Yue guang rong yao de zhao ying

The moon cake awaiting
月饼等待
Yue bing den dai

I yearn to gaze and eat
我渴望的目光和吃
Wo ke wang de mu guang he chi

By a river in moonlight
由一个在月光河
You yi ge zai yue guang he

In an ancient village
在一个古老的村庄
Zai yi ge gu lao de chun zhuang

Pretty lanterns and willow trees
漂亮的灯笼和柳树
Piau liang de deng long he liu shu

Boulevard the waters
大道水域
Da dao shui yu

Romantic and enchanting
浪漫和迷人
Lang man he mi ren

At last, vision is but a vapor
最后,视觉只不过是水蒸气
Zui hou, shi jue zhi bu guo shi shui zhen qi

That vanishes by the break of the day
这消失的一天休息
Zhe xiao shi de yi tian xiu xi

Yet, this dream, my hope
然而,这个梦,我的希望
Ran er, zhe ge meng, wo de xi wang,

My desire, my wish
我的愿望,我的愿望
Wo de yuan wang, wo de yuan wang

A Joyful Moon Cake Festival
欢乐的月饼节
Huan le de yue bing jie

Before moonset for another day
另一天月落之前
Ling yi tian yue luo zhi qian

This, is my earnest wish for you
这是我对你的殷切希望
Zhe shi wo dui ni de yin qie xi wang

- lim ju boo 林 如 武 (Lin Ru Wu)

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Jesus First Miracle in the Eyes of Science


Please click onto the the revised link below

Jesus First Miracle: A Hind Thought in My Eyes

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2024/


The Mystery of Life: An Unmeasurable Vital Force

Mysteries of Life:

An unmeasurable Vital Force

Dear Ms Gewen,


Mysteries of Life

“Hype over Craig Venter's latest achievement outstrips the actual greatness of it (Scientific American): From GenomeWeb”

Thank you for the above article you e-mailed to me on life and what was mentioned in that web. I decided to reply to your attachment and your letter, and put my own personal thoughts on this subject as my reply to you. It is below in my blog.

First published on Wednesday, September 8, 2010

My view:

What exactly is this thing called ‘life’ is a horrendous puzzle scientists can never be answered. They need to look to God for the answer. Only God can tell us.

Tons of books, but no definition:

The scientists can write tons and tons of books on biology, zoology, botany and all disciplines of biological and biomedical sciences that could fill up entire national libraries, and even into the Internet, but not a single one of them so far has define what life is, let alone tell us exactly what life is, least of all, measure it?

Is it a vital force, an energy or what?

Is it a force, a form of energy, a vitalism (vital force), a power, a spirit, a soul, a kind of un-measurable invisible entity that resides inside a physical body that is able to control the pathways of thousands of biochemical reactions in a living body until it leaves the body when we die, leaving only the empty skeletal shell behind it once lived in? 

When that happens all, every single chemical and biochemical reaction MUST come to and instant stop and return to the soil where they once belong because there is no more 'vital force' to control them anymore.

As a graduate in chemistry I am very familiar with the laws that govern chemical reactions. Some chemical reactions like like hydrogen and oxygen into water by burning, and water back into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis are reversible, but many chemical reactions like the living chemistry of life into the chemistry of death are totally irreversible. 

We understand this from our knowledge in biochemistry, physiology, chemical pathology and in medicine we learn forward and backwards and forward again many times over and have taken hundreds of examinations on these in the universities all our life 

Characteristics of Life, but not Life itself:

When I was in school, we were asked in our science class what is life? We would rattle off things like ‘life response to stimulus, it feeds, it reproduces, it respires, it has locomotion…and so on. We were taught that way.

But these are characteristics of life, but not life itself. The question is ‘what exactly is life’? No scientist so far has ever answered this, not as far as I have read. They don’t even know how to define it, let alone describe or measure it.

Chemical footprints only:

Neither is life, DNA, nucleic acid, protein or an infective prion, sugars, electrolytes, salts that conduct bio-electricity, and so on life itself. 

All these are just non-living organic nitrogen molecular fragments such as sugars, amino acids and minerals, but they are all non-living. They cannot have all the characteristics of life without a living host.

DNA for instance is just a chemical footprint of the existence of life, but DNA itself is not living. Neither are nano-fragments of a protein-like substance called prion. They cannot thrive without a living host. It has to enter a living body to reside and multiply there.

A Life for a Life! Cannot be Substituted:

A life can only give or transfer this ‘vital force’ to another life. Life cannot evolve from non-life objects like stones, cement metals and plastics. 

A life has to be sacrificed to give life to another life just as Jesus did. Similarly, all of us, including the animals have to sacrifice its life as food to give another life, since food was once thriving with life till it was sacrificed to support another life – The Bread of Life.

Scientists correctly call this the carbon food chain till it returns to the earth on death to sprout out as plants life to provide food for other animals to consume as food. This chain in cycles goes on and on. We cannot eat bricks, mud, soil or another thing that does not have life in them.

Chemicals of Life:

 In the 19th century it was found that microorganisms such as yeast and fungi were responsible for biochemical reactions such as in fermentation. 

This gave rise to questions whether or not such biochemical activities were an indication that some kind of life force that existed only in living matter were responsible for the chemistry of living things.

 However, in 1897 Eduard Buchner discovered that yeast extract in the absence of non-living yeast or micro fungi can form alcohol from a sugar solution.  

Scientists then  concluded that biochemical activity  do not necessarily require the presence of living cells, but can be driven by special chemical substances, called enzymes found in the cells.

 Although this may be true, we still are not able to dismiss the fact that all enzymes originally are formed in the living cells, but they can be extracted out in a laboratory to drive a biochemical reaction outside a cell. This means that enzymes have a living origin.  We can’t escape that! So we are back to square one. 

Life for Life:

It requires a life to support another life and yet another life. I suppose that is why Christians give grace and thanks for every meal they eat no matter how rich they are. 

They can buy many other things – property, land, luxury cars, etc. etc. but  they cannot eat them as they are all non-living. 

They cannot create or buy  life, or change a non-living substance into a living thing. That power belongs absolute, and solely to God and God only. 

A rich man cannot create life and use it for his daily food to keep him alive. He has to buy, grow, bargain, or beg for food which once has life in it, sacrifice it, and transfer that force into his body to keep him alive.


This was the life that was sacrificed and he must thank God for his daily meals / bread as all Christian rich or poor must realized. 

Even kings, presidents and prime ministers do not have that power. All must thank God for a life God created to give life to another. Jesus did just that. Most of us do not realize this? Be thankful as  I write my on thoughts that all food once have life on them till we 'kill' it as food 

The Gift of God:

It is the free gift of God to all living things. Life itself cannot be bought with our physical wealth. I believe most Christian do not understand this spiritual knowledge yet scientific and logical enough for us to accept. Most Christians merely were told to give grace for their daily living (literally) bread, but actually they do not know the reason 

The Goldilocks Zone:

When astronomers, particularly astrobiologists attempts to look for life as we know it in an exoplanet of another stellar system he would be searching for a planet within a habitable zone called the Goldilocks Zone around a star where the temperature is just right, namely it must not be too hot or too cold for liquid water to exist.

We know that all biological life requires water to exist, without which no life is possible But that is true to my understanding if the existence of physical life is incorporated together with an unknown life force such as a soul residing inside a physical body that may not require water to exist.

 Let bring us to the question if a soul exists? Briefly explained,  the existence of life whether here on Earth or elsewhere in the immensity of this Universe may require two ingredients – the chemicals of life such as DNA, amino acids, sugars, salts or electrolytes , water plus a soul or some kind of “vital energy” yet to be clearly and specifically defined. 

In short, life = chemicals of life plus a "living force" 

As many as 123 definitions of life have been attempted and complied since the ancient Greeks and but none till today is satisfactory.  

One definition seems to be favored by NASA: “a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution. 


Definition of Life:


The normal definition of life  is one that has cellular organization, ability to grow, respire,  involves in metabolism and homeostasis, feeds and excretes, ability to reproduce itself, respond to stimuli and undergo evolution

One of the easiest ways to remember the definition of a living organism is the use of an acronym called MRS GREN to mean Movement, Respiration, Sensitivity, Growth, Reproduction, Excretion and Nutrition.

However, this definition like all other over 100 definitions attempted till today still does not specifically and accurately define life itself. 

All only describe the characteristic or properties of a living organism, but not life itself. So what is it?

No satisfactory answer can be given without bringing in some un-measurable force or entities residing inside that makes the chemistry of life ticks as we know it.

Does Soul Exist?

 Besides water that is indispensable for the existence of all life, can other forms of life exist without water? 

Water  is essential in order for most chemical reactions to take place.

This is especially true as water is  needed as a media to carry the countless metabolic pathways in a living body. 

But  is there something else, such a spirit or a soul that thrive inside a living body that can live forever without  water  and yet is able to control all the thousands of  chemical reactions taking place in a living body? 

In order to answer that, let’s look at what the Bible has to say before God created Adam.

And every plant of the field BEFORE it was in the earth, and every herb of the field BEFORE it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to RAIN upon the earth, and there was NOT a man to till the ground.

 But there went up A MIST (water) from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul”

(Genesis 2:5-7)

I am unsure how other interpret these 3 verses, but to me it is so crystal clear that water was needed first before the Lord God took the dust from the ground to create Adam.

But Adam was still not living UNTIL the Lord God blew into his nostrils God’s own breath and Adam became a LIVING SOUL.

Please note these two words “living” plus “soul”

If we put them together Adam was still NOT living, not until God blew His  “life force” inside his body. 

This 'breath of life' into Adam's lifeless body is  yet to be defined by Science till today. 

 Dead Body + God Breath of Life (Life Force or Soul) = A Living Soul

 Does that ring the bell to most of us that a dead physical body needs a soul to be alive, and it is  this soul / spirit / life force whatever way we like to describe it inside a living body that controls all the thousands chemistries of life till it dies and returns to the soil from where it first came.

In other words, this life force control all the laws of chemistry we learn in our chemistry and biochemistry of  in a living body we learn in our undergraduate and postgraduate degree courses 

When this 'living force' leaves the physical body, the body dies, and all the chemistry of life break down and return lifeless back into the soil, because there is no longer any higher force to control the laws of chemistry anymore 

Does that make scientific sense to most of us reading this? It is very uncanny to learn or hear  this the first time 

We are made of Star Dusts:

If we have studied astronomy as I did at Oxford, we will understand we were all made from star dusts as a result of a supernova explosion somewhere among the massive stars millions or billions of light years away whose dusts landed here on Earth just about the same time Earth was created some 4.5 billion years ago.

We may have all originated from another world somewhere among the countless billions of trillions of trillion of stars first before we were all sent here to begin a new life in another world called Earth in another  stellar (solar) system after the other world ended its life violently in a supernova explosion? However we shall not go into this subject further as it is beyond the scope of this essay.

The Bible teaches us, without most Christians realizing this:


‘in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou returnest to the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. ... (Genesis 3:19).

This is what scientists called the carbon food chain. Absolutely how true and logical

‘Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God ....’ (Ecclesiastes 12:7).

Again, absolutely how true as we have reasoned it above, that when life chemistries end in our body, this thing called ‘life’ leaves the empty shell (body) and returns to the Giver of that ‘vital force’? 

We can see this scientific logic now – something I have wondered since a child.

 Spiritual Life:

 In Revelation 21:1 it gives us a hint that a new spiritual life in a new heaven when the present one ends, life there does not require water anymore for its eternal existence because our souls is not made of water when it leave our physical body (that requires water).

Water is not required when our soul enters into a new spiritual heaven:

“Then I saw ‘a new heaven and a new earth,’ for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.”

Life is A Lamp of Life:


Consider my thoughts that life can only be transfer from life-to-life. Consider a series of unlit lamps. The lamps are our bodies, what I consider as just the physical shell of the body. It has no life in it. They all have oils and wicks in them. 

These only represent all the physical structures and all the chemicals found in the body. These are the skeleton (wick), and all the glucose, DNA, amino acids, proteins, fats, minerals, biological fluids, etc. 

These ingredients represent the oils and fuel in the body. But where is the flame which to me is the life itself. I call this The Flame of Life. 

The oils and wicks in them are just the non-living chemicals in a body. They are all unlit and un-burnt.

 In biochemistry and nutrition we call this metabolism. But what sets off this metabolism? Definitely it is not the chemicals inside. The oils and wick cannot mysterious burn by themselves.

The Lamp and Soul of Life:

In other words, the  unlit lamp  represents the whole physical body, the wick within are the systems, organs, tissues and cells that draws the oils of the lamp for its nourishment, but it is the flame that is the soul of the lamp that kept the entire lamp warm, bright and burning 


They must be lighted in the first place. Someone must carry the first torch – the flame (life) itself to light up the first lamp. 

Only then the first lamp will be lighted. Only then can this flame be transferred from one lamp to the next lamp. This was God who blew the flame into the nostrils of Adam to light up the first human life on Earth.

The Chain of Life called Evolution:

Only then can the Flame of Life be transferred from one person to another or from one living organism to another up the carbon chain as scientists call it.

Charles Robert Darwin FRS (12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882) the English Naturalist from the University of Cambridge during his almost 5 years sea voyage in the HMS Beaqle all along the coasts of Africa to South America and to Australia collected vast specimen of life along the route, and published his world renown ‘The Origin of Spices’ was actually describing this flame of life spreading all over Earth which we call it Evolution of Life. 

To my mind today, it was just the flame being transferred from lamp to lamp. To my mind, Darwin did not contradict the Bible’s Genesis how life was created.


The Potter and the Clay: 


The creation of life is liken to the poitter and the clay. He take the clay from the soil to design and mould his potteries and fingurines. 

Even after the potter has moulded his wares, they are still not the finished products. The clay potteries, figurines are still soft, limp, “lifeless” so to speak, and unfinished. In order for his wares to be useful to withstand the pressures of the environment, they need to change and adapt to very harsh environmental fluctuations to harden them.  They need to be fired in a furnace to toughen them.

 

That fire is the lamp of life firing its energy into the clay to harden them for their survival over a certain lifespan.  That’s where the breath of life of God unseen and unmeasurable was pumped into every life till today even for each child or offspring born to a mother for them to survive environmental changes.

 

It is not necessary that the mother must give or pass on life to the child on birth.  The child can still be stillborn and dead when born. On a living birth we are all different

 

Similarly with the potteries of the potter.  Each of his wares are different from each other even for the same design and model of his wares, as much are cups, saucers, bowls, vases all different in the hands of a potter using exactly the clay and soil from the earth where all life and clay porcelain must begin. It is up to the potter how and what he wants to do with the clay from the soil. But all the potteries and figurines are unfinished products and must be being brought to the fire of a furnace to “pump life into them” figuratively translated    

 

As much as we, and all life created on earth are either slightly genetically different from each other or, as an entirely different species of life

 

All zoologists and evolutionary biologists know no life on earth is precisely the same or were they evolved from one species seamlessly to the next without a single missing link. A tiger is entirely different from a lion, cheetah, puma, jaguar, leopard, lynx, and a domestic cat., although they are all cats of the same family.

 

So are all the different species of fishes in the oceans as much as all the different birds in the air. They are all entirely different species of life as much as cups, saucers, bowls, plates and all porcelain products are different in the hands of the potter. They may be the same products, but they are still subtle differences. They are not exactly the same as all human races are different although we are all the human species as much as not all dogs, wolves and dingos are the same in the hands of God their Creator.

 

As scientists we are familiar with the classification of animals and into domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, suborder, families, genus and species, as much as we are familiar with genetics, and evolutionary biology, but we cannot explain why all life and animals seemed to be evolved so separately at different times since 3.7 billion years ago. The question we ask ourselves is, were they created separately which is quite different from being evolved very slowly through the eons of tens of millions of years for each species as given in the list here through the corridors of millions of years.  

 

The question we also ask is, why are they so different if the changes are so infinitesimally minute due to tiny, tiny mutagenic changes over such a long period of time. In such a slow evolutionary process their anatomy, morphology and other features including their adaptability to the environment ought to be almost seamless or almost the same? But why are they so different and adapt so differently?  

 

We do not know the answer using our understanding of minute mutagenic  changes of their genes and why there are large differences in the nucleotide sequence of their DNA, at least my understanding on zoology, genetics and in evolutionary biology does not permit me.   

 

But who are you, O man, to answer back to God?  Will what is moulded say to its moulder, “Why have you made me like this? Does the potter have no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honourable use and another for dishonourable use?  (Romans 9:20–21)

 

 “Woe to him who strives with him who formed him, a pot among earthen pots!

Does the clay say to him who forms it, ‘What are you making?’

or ‘Your work has no handles?”  (Isaiah 45:9)

 

“Then the Lord said to him, '' Who has made man’s mouth? Who makes him mute, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the Lord?”


 (Exodus 4:11)


Time is Relative:

Time with the Lord a day is like a thousand years (to humans) and a thousand years are like a day (to God). (2 Peter 3:8).


A million years in evolution of life on Earth is just a day in Creation for God. He created everything in 7 Days, and one can imagine how long in epoch and geological time scale this was for a human.

Again what yardstick did  scientists use to  measure time? Was it Earth’s time based on Solar time of 24 hour / day, Solar Year of 365.25 Solar Days, or was it on a Galactic Year which is 226 millions of years over a radius of about 26 thousand light-years through which a galaxy spins?

God Eternal Time Cannot be Measured:

This is like conducting an medical experiment on rats and measuring time using a rat’s life span as the yardstick. Why not we use our life span or our clock as we normally do when we measure time as the measurement of time.

When scientists conduct an experiment on rats in a laboratory  it is like God conducting an experiment on us using God's time and not our time similar to us using rat's time. We don't do that. We use time as given on our human clock as much as God measure time according to His yardstick of measurements which is eternity 

 Most scientists  believe Creation of Life on Earth was not in a day, but in millions of years through  evolution. 

But most Christians were misled by Satan to interpret the time literally given in Genesis 

Satan even managed to effectively blinded the highly eminent Cambridge scientist Charles  Darwin FRS into believing the creation and evolution of life could not have taken Day 1, Day 2 ...Day 6.

If Satan could blind such a scientific intellectual, we can see how effectively Satan has blinded billions of humans over the centauries.

In Bondage and in Darkness:

All these argumentative and quarrelsome scientists are very effectively and heavily blinded by Satan so that they cannot escape. 

Satan is very cleaver Devil who came in disguise to permanently blind and deceive people including the learned scientists and religious people, the believers and the disbelievers to keep all of them into eternal bondage of darkness by using their scientific knowledge to clash with spiritual wisdom God actually gave them. 

But the Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.’

From Lamp-to-Lamp:

It is only a flame (of life) can be transferred from one unlit lamp to the next unlit lamp. If not for this vital force (life or energy), all the lamps will remain unlit throughout all eternity. This mysterious vital force can only given by God Himself. 

No other person has this gift and power. So we ask ourselves where this flame came from. Was it originally brought to Earth from outer-space and seeded onto Earth as some scientists like Astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle (1915–2001) of Cambridge and Chandra Wickramasinghe (1939 - ) in their panspermia theory believed?

Life seeded from Outer Space?

Even if life was seeded by comets in the Black Orts Clouds in the Kuiper belt at the fridges of the Solar System, where and how were those viruses created. They couldn’t just be present without an origin in the cosmic Black Cloud? 

Even if they were exogenous sources of life, viruses still cannot multiply without a living host on Earth. So how did life began on Earth? Where did that flame come from?

My answer is it must only come from a non-material Being, a Creator, a Programmer, and an Intelligent Designer we respectfully called God. 

But I am not sure about Allah which the Muslims do not allow the Christians to use in Malaysia, but not in all other Islamic countries since Allah is just an Arabic name for God to my understanding 

But  I am also unsure about the names of gods of other religions.

Only One Nameless God I know:

I only know the God of the Christians, the God of the Jews, and the same God of Israel that protected them from the Palestine to this day as written in the Bible (Deuteronomy 7:6, Deuteronomy 11:12). This is the only living God the Christians know. 

I do not think God ever gave a name for Himself? He is Spiritual Being. He does not require a name for Himself and He requires no earthy mortals to call him by a certain name? That’s my inner thought, that still small voice speaking to me. I do not know about others.

The Christians acknowledge Him as their Heavenly Father just as all children on Earth respectfully call their parents as ‘father, daddy, dad, papa, mama, mummy, mum, etc.

No children will disrespectfully address their parents by their surnames or any other names such as Mr. so and so, or Mrs. so, and so! How rude for children to do this. We just call our parents "papa or mama" 

Now my gentle readers can read my thoughts, just a glimpse of it what I thought as a boy, and penned it down all 48 pages of them on January 1981.

My Small Thought:

I have since as a small child  thought about this mystery for a long time.

In the January of 1981 I decided to write about this, and had my thoughts ‘The Mystery of Life’ published in the Newsletter of the Astronomical Society of Malaysia (ASM). It was a lengthy article expressing my thoughts, my views on the biochemistry in the body before and after death.

I then described what happens to this vital force residing inside the body once it leaves the body as an empty shell.

jb lim

Genesis vs. Evolution: The Great Merge of Religion and Science. An Analysis

The Scientific Basis of Genesis and Evolution

Scientists argue that the creation of Earth, seas, light, dry land, and the various creatures in the seas, in the air and dry land were not they know from the geological point of view. This caused me to read Genesis again and again. The more I read the first chapter of the Bible on Creation, the clearer it became to my mind that there was nothing wrong with it, especially the order of the sequence in geological time and the order of the appearance of plants, sea creatures, the birds of the air, followed by the animals and mammals on dry land, and only finally Man (Adam) and women (Eve) appeared. What’s wrong with this order? There is nothing there that conflicts with what we know from Science.

My understanding:

To the best of my understanding on botany, zoology and on evolution, this was the exact geological time scale in which all the plants and animals need to queue up one after another before they can survival in the primordial environment of Earth some 4.54 thousand million years ago when Earth was first created from what scientists believe.

The more I read Genesis, the more fitting it became to what we know. It just falls into one beautiful piece of how life came to Earth, step-by-step, group-by –group before they can survive and thrive from the beginning.

There was nothing wrong with that order exactly as Charles Darwin described in his Origin of the Species. There was not a single flaw in that appearance of all the living creatures. They all emerged one-by-one in groups as scientists have been telling us all the time.

Let’s examine the order again:

Naturally in the beginning the Earth was without any form if it was a chunk of molten material spun out from the Sun by a passing star or other causes as scientists believe. Natural it was, without any definite shape but just as if it was a big chunk of molten glass is taken out from the furnace in a glass-making factory. What’s wrong with that? Obviously it is void of anything on it as much as we don’t expect to find any bacteria on a chunk of molten glass just taken out from the fiercely hot furnace? You will have to let it cool first before anything can be deposited inside. That was what God told us, and this is very logical.

As the Earth slowly cooled over billions of years, water began to condense on its surface, but they will boil off again. It was still a very hot surface thus giving off a lot of steam which shrouded the entire surface of Earth with water as thick hot steam above and condensed water below. There was thus no division of waters above as semi-steam mixed semi-water (very thick mist, cloud and water vapour), and the half condensed water on the surface below.

As water tried to condense, it would again boil off to the mix with the steam mixture above. Thus there was no clear division under such state which is water (sea) and which is sky (firmament). Everything was just semi-water and semi-air because conditions on Earth were still very hot.
As the cooling continued, water vapor began to escape and condense in the earth's early atmosphere. Clouds formed and storms raged, raining more and more water down on the primitive earth, cooling the surface further until it was flooded with water, forming the seas.

It would take probably about 100,000 million Earth years more for Earth to slowly cool off for the steam to slowly settle down as sea below, revealing a clearer sky (firmament) above.

Once the steam and the mist settled as the Earth further cooled, the sky with less clouds, mist and rain above settled, a clear sky can now be clearly seen. Being able to then see clearly, we can now visualize the day as made up of morning and evening and night. In short, He separated the day from night.

6 And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters." 7 And God made the firmament and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament. And it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day Genesis 1:6-8)

How does the above account of Creation conflict with what geological scientists believe?

Even before that the light from the stars and the galaxies were already there except you may not be able to see them yet with so much of rain, hot steam, clouds, mists cycling between the waters below the firmament and the skies above enveloping the entire Earth. It was nothing but just a ball of boiling water, hot and thick steam everywhere. You can’t differential what was above and what was below.

There was no horizon or clear division dividing what was supposed to be the sea as we know it today, and what was supposed to be the sky and atmosphere with less water content. But as the steam slowly over billion of years of cooling settled. The division then became apparent:

‘And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters." 7 And God made the firmament and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament. And it was so.’

Even the day and night, light and darkness became apparent after the Earth cooled sufficiently to allow steam to condense into the oceans and seas to reveal night from day, with the firmament (sky) above, and the waters (oceans and seas) below became clear.

‘And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.’ 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day’. 9

If not for the slow cooling and condensation of the thick steam, mists and clouds, even the day was not apparent. Probably it could never be seen as everywhere there was just haze, and the entire Earth was very, very dark and hazy indeed.

Once the seas are formed from condensation, the land began to appear above the waters by geological upheaval by tectonic plates colliding below the ocean floors. Earth was much hotter during the Hadean and Archaean eons so convection in the mantle causing the land to rise above the waters (seas) must have been faster. It started at Earth's formation about 4.6 billion years ago (4600 Ma).

And God said, "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good. 11

Isn’t that not logical? Isn’t that exactly what was described in just two sentences (verses) in Genesis (Genesis 1:9-10). There is nothing wrong with that. You don’t expect the Bible to spend so much time and space to write entire books, publications and journals on ancient geology like geologists do to describe unnecessary details to fill up entire national libraries. The important mission of the Bible will be lost then. The Bible is a book on salvation, not a science book.

Living things appeared:

Once water is introduced into the climate, life may exist. Bacteria, algae, fungus, and then plants formed first. After that came swarms of living creatures, great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, like fish, and later and every winged bird according to its kind.

Sea creatures like fish and other seas monsters must arise from the sea first before moving onto dry land with animals like the dinosaurs that could roamed the earth. Other creatures like birds and other flying creatures then evolved from the reptiles and dinosaurs that can live during the transient period both in the water and dry land.

Other higher land animals like mammals… ‘cattle, and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground’ then began their appearances.

And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the firmament of the heavens." 21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth." 23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day. 24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds." And it was so. 25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the cattle according to their kinds, and everything that creeps upon the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good 26 (Genesis 1:21-26).

Only after all the plants and animals were created, Man (Adam and Eve) began to come last. Isn’t this exactly what scientists also discovered and believe that the evolution of Man came last?

Satan out to blind us:

How can with all those brief descriptions in Genesis, there is conflict between Science and Religion as scientist argues. They must be terribly clouded in the eyes and blind-folded by Satan who is all out to question, confuse and prevent them from thinking logically.

All these order of appearances, the plants first to remove the excess of carbon dioxide to convert them into oxygen by photosynthesis for all other animals to come later are all in exactly the same order of appearances what scientists know from fossil remains in the geological time scale, and their order of evolution as described by Charles Darwin in his publication on ‘The Origin of Species’ This order is also as exactly described in Genesis. There is absolutely no conflict between Science and the Bible if we read this and think clearly.

God’s Infinite Time Scale is incomparable:

The only difference is the time scale which to the scientists, life on Earth took millions of years to evolved species by species, but which according to the Bible, was created in the same large groups in just 1-2 ‘days’. Please be reminded once again, this is measured in God’s Days which is almost an Eternity. I have explained this at length and there no need to repeat this. The problem is scientists are very blind. They are so used to measure everything so accurately, specifically and precisely, that they use only their human judgment that everything was measured according to human time scale of a mere few billion years. Their eyes are so clouded that they forgot God has a different time scale which is eternity – time without an end.

Five billion years to Man was just a Watch in the Night:

The problem scientists do not agree is the time taken. They say that it takes over 4.5 thousand million years for the heaven and the Earth to be formed, but the Bible says it took God just one day (Genesis 1:6). I can’t imagine how idiotic and blind these scientists are. They interpreted the Bible literally without understanding its deep, deep meaning.

Bible is Not a Book on Science:

The Bible is not a book on astronomy, astrophysics, geology, zoology, botany or any of that stuff. The Bible is a very important book on the salvation for mankind to prepare him for eternity, and the entire Bible concentrate on his theme only. Scientists can write tons and tons of books on various scientific subjects to fill out all the details the Bible has no choice but to leave out, and concentrate only on the most important mission and message to mankind, that is to prepare him for an eternal life after death.

Even the creation of heaven and earth together is given in just one sentence (one single verse) in the first verse of Genesis and no more. It was a horrendously stupendous act of Architecture and Engineering of His handiwork which He only put it in one sentence without unnecessary going into details.

Mission is on Salvation, not on knowledge:

If scientists like, there is nothing to stop them from studying the details of His awe-inspiring and stunning handiwork. They can write volumes and volumes of scientific discoveries to fill up entire libraries on this planet. But that is not God mission in the Bible. His much, much more important mission is to save mankind from eternal death, and not write a science book on how the universe, earth and life was created.
God does not use wall clocks and calendars:

God has all the time for Himself, and is not restricted by our human Earth’s days and years. Our days are restricted by our limited Solar day of 24 hours, and our Tropical or Solar Year of 365.25 Solar Days.

There is also no reason why God need to use our clocks and calendars as yardstick to measure time.

For a thousand years to man is like a day to God (2 Peter 3:8).

This means that, even 100,000 million years or even a peta (1015), exa (1018), zeta (1021), yotta (1024) years or even much, much longer in our human time scale, may be just few hours, a few minutes, a second, or even a infinitesimal fraction of one second to God. It could easily be as short as a micro (10-6), nano (10-9), pico (10-12), femto (10-15), atto (10-18), zepto (10-21), yocto (10-24) of one second or much, much shorter for God. This is because to God, time has no end.

To God, time is infinitely eternal. He can wait as long as He wishes, and what we humans described as a billion, a trillion, or a quadrillion years could well be just ‘First Day, Second Day, Third Day’ and so forth for Him. So there is no way we can use our clocks and calendar as a yardstick to match his Eternal Time Yardstick.

Biological example:

Let me give you an example. The lifespan of an adult mayfly varies from just 30 minutes to one day depending on the species. Another example is the gastrotrich which is a tiny 0.06 - 3.0 mm animal abundant in fresh water and marine environments. The average life span of a gastrotrich is about three days. So when scientists conduct an experiment on these animals, surely they do not use their short life-spans as a yardstick for time measurements. The scientists would obviously use their time shown on their clocks and calendars to describe how long they live. Isn’t this reasonable that God uses His own clock?

To these two animals their time scale and lifespan may be 100, a 1,000 or a million years, just as we may say in geological time scale, during the Hadean / Precambrian super-eon started 4570 million years ago when Earth was first formed, which to God may be just a fraction of a atto-second ago, or just Day 1 in Genesis.

Slow to us but fast to God:

To us humans everything is very, very slowly evolving just like it took procaryotes, protists, fungus and algae to first appear on Earth during the early Cambrian period, until the first grasses, then whales appearing during the Eocene Epoch about 40.4 million years ago, before the flowering plants and mammals 33.9 million years ago during the Oligocene Epoch. But it could be a few minutes to God (measured in His time yardstick).

Millions of Years for us, but a Day or two for Him:

May be it was only during the Middle Age , somewhere between the Pliocene Epoch that and Pleistocene Epoch around 5.3 – 0.5 million years ago that humans like Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Methuselah, Noah, and down the list of descendants to Moses and so forth came into being.
Like the rest of the animal and plant kingdom where almost an infinite variety of them are found on the surface of Earth today through the slow process of evolution, humans too may have being evolved into a large variety of races, feature and skin characteristics spread out all over the world.

Multiply and be fruitful:

We do not know much, but we believe that Homo sapiens (wise man) which modern man (Homo genus) walking on two legs (bipedal primates) belongs 160,000 years ago, were capable of thinking. They maybe genetically related descendants of Adam and Eve. The human genomes are identical world-wide, except variations in the gene sub-types among the races.

Chimps are not humans:

But any other human-like hominids (great apes) such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans, genetically, and bio-chemically cannot be considered as humans as we know it. They belong to sub-human genera even though they are classified as members (hominids) of the family of humans called hominidae. There is clear distinction and biological differentiation between Man and animals. They are not related with definitive missing links between them. Evolution of the different species is entirely different from the continuous changes we can observe from an egg, into an embryo, before becoming an adult. The link is very smooth and seamless, telling us they are the same organism. But this is not with hominids – apes and humans.

Social and biological differences:

Creation as described in Genesis, as I believe, include not just Adam and Eve and their (human) descendants, but also other human-like creatures like chimpanzees, apes, gorillas, orangutans as part of the overall creation of all kinds of creatures by God, even though the Bible did not specifically name all of them. There is just no reason why God cannot create other human-like hominids as part of other creatures to multiply and thrive among Adam and Eve, because they are biologically, genetically, bio-chemically, physiologically, psychologically, anthropologically, and socially so different from us humans. No human wants to be classified in the same biological capacity as apes. In short, Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Methuselah, Noah, and down the list of descendants to Moses were not apes, but humans with social and thinking capacity who happened to be created also among apes, and other creatures, just as we are among other hominids completely unchanged we see today.

Darwin was not God:

There is no reason why Adam and Eve were evolved from apes and other sub-human hominids? In short, they were all created separately. In my eyes I see no conflict between the long-winded accounts on the Origin of the Species by Charles Darwin, and one by God on Creation.

There is an astronomical difference between an Eternal God who created not just the animals, plants, and everything on Earth, but the entire Universe through the inspired writing of Moses who merely summarized the entire creation of Heaven and Earth in just a few pages, and a mortal human being like Charles Darwin who published volumes on his evolution theory. That is the difference between God and man.

No change even after 50 million years:

No change between sub-human hominids and humans was observed even after 50 million years. Humans and living apes living together used to be thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years ago, or even up to 30 or 40 million years ago. But modern humans thriving on Earth after Adam and Eve may have spread some 200,000 years ago, with full modern behaviour around 50,000 year ago. We are still uncertain, but some scientists believe this was the time frame between the existence of humans and sub-human hominids on Earth.

But even after 50 million years, apes and gorillas continued to remain as apes and gorillas, and humans remain as humans like you and I. There is no link between the two God’s creations

by jb lim
A hind thought

Buddhism: Is it A Religion or Way of Life?

  I dedicate this essay of mine to Ir. CK Cheong who is  a Buddhist. Having written an article on Hinduism dedicated to Prof Dr Vythilingam,...