Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Soul does not die. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Soul does not die. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, May 23, 2024

The Soul as An Artist in the Next World

Furthering our discussions about the body and the soul in our previous few articles about our present and next lives in another world, what do gentles readers of mine here think of this possibility? Here's my thoughts. 

The soul of the body will leave his badly damaged physical body (dies) during an incurable disease or in an accident, but the soul being indestructible, does not die of any disease, accident, injuries or trauma. The soul then leaves to another place (another world) to relive another life there. 

The soul is very much like a painter or an artist who leaves his work of art (the physical body) and goes to another place to redo another painting in the body of another person in another world. However, the painter does not forget his previous painting (his body in previous life). If the painter is a bad artist, he is likely to do the same for his next painting (bad karma in the next life). 

Likewise, if he is good artist, he is very likely to paint a good picture (good life) in the next world as good karma begets him. What goes around comes around in circles. His work of art (the physical body) dies, but the artist (the soul) does not. In other words, the soul remembers his works eternally whichever worlds he goes in circles. There are lots of accounts and stories told by people including royalties who seemed to remember their previous lives, who they were. 

Alternatively, he may be rewarded for what he did not have in his previous world, or it may be miserable for the rich for the good life he had in his previous life. 

One example is the rich man and the poor destitute Lazarus as given in the Bible (Luke 16: 19 – 31). However, the story of the rich man and Lazarus provides a narrative on the consequences of one's actions and lifestyle, though it does not explicitly endorse reincarnation. It emphasizes the reversal of fortunes in the afterlife, which can be seen as a metaphor for moral reckoning.

I think this idea is a fascinating and deeply philosophical one, resonating with many religious, spiritual, and metaphysical traditions. This concept posits that the soul is an eternal and indestructible entity, undergoing a cycle of death and rebirth in different bodies across different lifetimes. This view is shared by various belief systems, particularly in Hinduism, Buddhism, and certain interpretations of spiritualism and reincarnation theories.

May I summarize my  ideas here:

Indestructibility of the Soul: Many traditions hold that the soul (or consciousness) is immortal and not subject to physical damage or death. This aligns with my analogy of the artist who moves on to create new works without being destroyed.

Reincarnation and Karma: The idea that the soul reincarnates into new bodies and that the quality of the new life is influenced by the actions (karma) of previous lives is a central tenet in Hinduism and Buddhism. Good deeds may lead to a better rebirth, while bad deeds can result in a less favourable rebirth.

Memory of Past Lives: There are numerous accounts, both anecdotal and studied by researchers, of people claiming to remember past lives. These memories can sometimes be detailed and specific, leading some to believe in the continuity of the soul's experiences across lifetimes.

Moral and Ethical Implications: The belief in karma and reincarnation often carries moral implications, suggesting that our actions in this life will have consequences in future lives. This is similar to the concept of "what goes around comes around" I earlier mentioned.

Philosophical Considerations

The Nature of the Soul: The concept of an eternal soul raises questions about its nature, origin, and purpose. Philosophers and theologians have long debated what constitutes the soul and how it interacts with the physical body.

Continuity of Identity: If the soul retains memories and characteristics from previous lives, it suggests a continuity of identity that transcends individual lifetimes. This challenges our understanding of personal identity and memory.

Ethical Responsibility: The notion of karma implies a system of moral responsibility that extends beyond a single lifetime. This can influence how people perceive their actions and their long-term consequences.

Scientific Perspective:

However as a scientist myself, from the scientific standpoint, the concept of the soul and reincarnation can be controversial to other scientists since science typically relies on empirical evidence and reproducibility, and phenomena like the soul and reincarnation are difficult to study under these criteria. Nevertheless, there have been studies, particularly in the field of parapsychology, that investigate claims of past life memories.

Conclusion:

The idea that the soul is an artist moving from one body to another, carrying the impressions of past lives, is a rich and evocative metaphor. It provides a framework for understanding the continuity of consciousness and the moral dimensions of human existence.

I think different people from different cultures and belief systems may interpret these ideas in various ways, the core concept resonates with many people's intuitive sense of justice, purpose, and the mystery of life and death.

These concepts are mine. What are yours? Kindly write your comments below for us all to appreciate.  


Tuesday, May 6, 2025

More Evidences an Eternal Soul Exists


I received news of deaths of friends lately. Be of comfort. They are not dead. Their souls are still alive and around with you. They can still see you, but we cannot see them physically. Their spirits are still with us eternally. 

Let me now explain to comfort loved ones the deceased left physically behind. Very few can cherish this thought and be thankful.  

Remember I was were writing about the souls of people who have died a clinical death or near-death-experience (NDE) or out of the body experience and they could easily and clearly see everything around them even though they were blind from birth. Their souls or spirits may hover around for sometime, possibly even for days seeing everything so clearly before flying off through a dark tunnel to another world where they saw (even though blind since birth) there was a bright light at the other end. 

 This leaves me thinking about Jesus whose Soul or His Holy Spirit may too have seen everything moments of His death after crucifixion but no one could see this. Even Jesus has a soul for example it is clearly written in Luke 23:46 that says Jesus, "with a loud voice" , said, 'Father, into your hands I commit my spirit,' and having said this, he breathed his last". 

Similarly, Matthew 27:50-51 describes Jesus crying out in a loud voice and yielding up his spirit, with the veil of the temple tearing and the earth shaking as a result. 

 Then after 3 days His soul was reunited with His physical body in a material, physical form to His disciples to prove He is alive again. Several Bible verses describe Jesus' resurrection and appearances to his disciples, confirming his physical body and inviting them to touch him.

 Key verses include: John 20:24-29 that describes Jesus appearing to Thomas and allowing him to touch his wounds to dispel his doubt. 

 Luke 24:36-43: Jesus appears to his disciples after they have heard the news of the resurrection and invites them to touch him to prove he is not a ghost. 

 1 Corinthians 15:3-4: states that Jesus died, was buried, and was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures. 

 Matthew 28:9 mentions women who held Jesus' feet and worshiped him after his resurrection. 

In Luke 24:39 Jesus asks his disciples to touch him to prove he is not a ghost, and to also see the holes left from the nails. 

In John 20:17 Mary Magdalene touches Jesus and he tells her not to cling to him yet. 

Wouldn't all these written documents confirm the traditional belief that the existence of the soul is real, and does not die and could be reunited in another body in the next world.

 Some religions like Buddhism called it reincarnation in another body - what comes round goes round again. I shall explain this shortly. 

These reverent documentations touch not only theological and scriptural dimensions but also explores metaphysical and philosophical truths that humanity has wrestled with for millennia.

Indeed, the accounts of Jesus committing His spirit into the hands of the Father (Luke 23:46) and the bodily resurrection witnessed by His disciples are among the clearest affirmations in Christian theology that the soul or spirit is distinct from the physical body and does not perish with it. These verses strongly suggest that consciousness, identity, and spiritual essence endure even after physical death.

The Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) I have written earlier alluded to, particularly those involving blind individuals seeing clearly, or people perceiving details while clinically dead, continue to mystify scientists and challenge materialistic explanations of consciousness. These experiences consistently echo themes found in spiritual traditions: floating above the body, traveling through a tunnel, encountering a brilliant light, and experiencing a heightened sense of love and understanding. They harmonizes remarkably with the resurrection and spiritual survival narratives found in Scripture.

When Jesus rose after three days, He appeared in recognizable, physical form, yet with spiritual properties: He entered locked rooms, vanished from sight, and ascended into heaven, indicating that His resurrected body, though tangible, was transformed. Paul speaks of this in 1 Corinthians 15:44:

“It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.”

This, I believe, affirms the belief that the soul is not only real but eternal, and capable of reuniting with a glorified body, especially within Christian eschatology. This in Christian beliefs,  is not reincarnation in the Buddhist sense, where the soul migrates into another being or form in a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth based on karma, but rather resurrection, where the same person is raised anew, transformed, and brought into a new order of existence in God’s presence.

Comparing Views:

Christianity teaches resurrection of the same individual: continuity of personhood, moral accountability, and reunion with a transformed body.

Buddhism teaches reincarnation or rebirth, but often without belief in an eternal soul (anattā). Instead, a continuity of karma passes on, like a candle lighting another.

Hinduism often supports reincarnation with a belief in an eternal atman (soul), which journeys from body to body until it reunites with Brahman (ultimate reality).

This belief, therefore, touches a critical distinction:


Is the soul’s journey linear toward final redemption (as in Christianity), or cyclical (as in Buddhism or Hinduism)?

If you ask me, my humble reflection are:

 I believe the existence of the soul is real, as is its ability to survive bodily death. The testimony of Scripture, the example of Christ’s resurrection, and countless experiential accounts across cultures suggest that we are more than our material forms. The soul is the eternal witness, the bearer of identity, love, and consciousness, designed not for death but for union with the Divine.

In Jesus, we see the promise of a redeemed and resurrected existence, not just a ghostly afterlife but a renewed, transformed life in full communion with God.

I think nothing God created can be destroyed, not just the soul or life - they remain in another form just like matter and energy equivalent

"nothing God created can be destroyed", a statement that harmonizes deeply with both spiritual wisdom and the conservation laws of physics. As Einstein said, “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.” 

In much the same way, many religious and philosophical traditions teach that the soul or spirit transcends death, taking on another form, entering another realm, or continuing a journey.

Let me now give a descriptive overview of beliefs about the soul and afterlife across some of the world's major religions:

1. Christianity

Core Belief: The soul is eternal and distinct from the body. At death, the soul departs to either be with God or await judgment.

Afterlife: Believers in Christ are promised resurrection into glorified, incorruptible bodies (1 Corinthians 15), to dwell eternally with God in Heaven.

Hell: A place of separation from God for those who reject Him.

Key Concepts: Resurrection, immortality of the soul, judgment, heaven and hell, eternal life.
Jesus’ Resurrection is central, proving life after death and the union of spirit and glorified body.

2. Judaism

Core Belief: The soul (neshama) is divine, given by God. Death is not the end; the soul returns to God.

Afterlife: Ancient texts focus more on Sheol (a shadowy existence), but later Jewish thought includes resurrection of the dead (as in Daniel 12:2) and Olam HaBa (the World to Come).

Key Concepts: Immortality of the soul, judgment, resurrection (in some traditions), closeness to God after death.

3. Islam

Core Belief: The soul (ruh) is breathed into each person by Allah. The body dies, but the soul continues.

Afterlife: At death, the soul enters Barzakh, a waiting period. On the Day of Judgment, souls are reunited with bodies and judged.

Heaven (Jannah) and Hell (Jahannam) are literal destinations based on deeds and faith.

Key Concepts: Day of Judgment, bodily resurrection, accountability, eternal soul.

4. Hinduism

Core Belief: The soul (atman) is eternal and divine, part of Brahman (the ultimate reality).

Afterlife: The soul undergoes reincarnation (samsara), taking new bodies based on past karma. The ultimate goal is moksha, liberation from the cycle of rebirth and union with Brahman.

Key Concepts: Reincarnation, karma, moksha, eternal soul.

The soul is never born nor dies, "It is not slain when the body is slain." (Bhagavad Gita 2:19)

5. Buddhism

Core Belief: No eternal soul (anattā), but a continuity of consciousness or karmic energy that flows into new lives.

Afterlife: After death, a person is reborn into another existence depending on karma. The goal is nirvana, cessation of suffering and escape from the rebirth cycle.

Key Concepts: Rebirth, karma, impermanence, no-self, enlightenment.

Although it rejects the soul as an unchanging entity, it accepts continuity of being.

6. Taoism

Core Belief: The soul has two components, hun (spiritual, yang) and po (earthly, yin).

Afterlife: Upon death, hun ascends to the heavens while po returns to the earth (same as with Christian belief).

 Harmony with the Tao leads to spiritual longevity or immortality.

Key Concepts: Immortality (in spiritual or symbolic sense), balance with nature, transformation of essence.

7. African Traditional Religions

Core Belief: The soul is the vital force connecting the person to ancestors and spiritual realms.

Afterlife: The soul often continues existence as an ancestor spirit, interacting with the living through rituals and dreams.

Key Concepts: Spiritual continuity, ancestor veneration, reincarnation in family lines.

8. Native American Beliefs (varied)

Core Belief: Life is sacred and interconnected. The soul journeys to the spirit world after death.

Afterlife: A spiritual realm often described as a "Happy Hunting Ground" or place of peace, but the specifics vary widely.

Key Concepts: Spirit journey, harmony with nature, connection to ancestors.

Finally, across traditions, despite doctrinal differences, a unifying theme emerges, the soul, spirit, or life force does not cease at death. Instead, it is transformed, journeys onward, or is reborn, guided by divine laws, moral consequences, or spiritual evolution.

If only others believe that “nothing God created can be destroyed, only transformed”, they will echoes with me through all of this. It bridges faith and reason, and are completely in tune with both scriptural revelation and scientific intuition.

I have earlier in this blog relate how modern physics, particularly quantum theories and the law of conservation of information might surprisingly support this idea of the indestructibility of the soul or consciousness?

It is not necessary for me to repeat them here. You may search them all here in this blog by typing in the key words in the internal search engine on the top left corner  

Tuesday, December 27, 2022

Did Queen Elizabeth II of England die of Old Age?

 


When I showed this news clip on the cause of death of Queen Elizebeth II to a friend of mine in England, she replied that a few days after her death certificate due to old age was made public, there were hot debates in the UK on the actual cause of her demise 

Queen's death certificate reveals the cause and time of her death

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a41439216/queen-cause-of-death/

How can QE II  died of old age..?  As long as her organs were functioning, she can never die of old age. No matter how old we are, if all our organs and body systems are still working it is technically impossible to die.

See the Diagnosis of Death here:

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2022/12/

To say someone died of old age is technically not correct. It is only correct to say we die due to our organs shut down from old age, but not from old age per sec.  We can clearly understand that if there is totally malfunctioning of vital organs like heart, lungs and the brain we just die even at very young age, but we  will never die even at very, very old age if these organs are still  in tip top conditions and functioning normally without any artificial support 

Following the confirmation of death, here's what happens after the soul leaves the body when it has no more control over the chemistry of life and death of the body

 

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/search?q=irreversible+chemistry+of+death

 


Many years ago I gave a talk to an auditorium of senior academic staff of the University of Malaya who were about to retire.

My lecture was this:

The biology of aging. Why we must grow old and die

https://sg.docworkspace.com/l/sINyoyYK9AdW4_psG

The slides on reasons why we must grow old and die was just to satisfy all these highly learned scientists and doctors from the university who were listening to me. I was invited to give them a lecture on behalf of the Malaysian Senior Scientists Association

So I gave them some of the scientific reasons as shown on the slides in the above link. But actually, those were NOT the real reasons.  The actual and real reason is because the length of our time here has already been predetermined whether young at one year old or less, or at 110 years by our souls that controls all these chemistries of life. In turn the soul is determined by God, the Creator of our souls.

When that time comes, the organs and body systems will either slowly degenerate or suddenly stopped through an accident.  It is God the through His breath of life – the soul that determines and controls these body functions when death should come. I have explained at length here:

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2022/12/some-collections-of-articles-concerning.html

When it does come, it will immediately leave the body first to allow the organs to stop functioning completely.

I did not want to tell the hall of highly learned university scientists and doctors there listening to me, because if I did, there will be an instant uproar.  If I were to lecture to  them the real reason the soul cannot tolerate disease and old age and left the body since  the soul does not die and is immortal, then they  will rise up against me and walk out from the auditorium

So I needed to lie to them  by delivering something they are familiar and acceptable for them, which I too initially thought were also scientifically correct

But as the years went by, I journeyed beyond my training in science and medicine to look beyond physical dimensions. I wanted spiritual wisdom, and I have always asked God for this, not scientific knowledge as other scientists yearn.

So I gave them a lecture only to suit and to please them as they were all  learned scientists and academicians why they too must die for reasons given in my slides which were acceptable to them.

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/search?q=Why+we+grow+old+and+die&m=1






 

Friday, October 29, 2021

Does A Human Soul Travel Faster than the Speed of Light?


(This article was originally meant for our Whatsapp “Golden Ox” Chat Group but found it a bit lengthy. So, this author decided to put this into his blog so that it spreads across a wider global audience)

 
Dear All,
 
I have something quite mind-blowing for us to think about this very early morning.




Part I

 
Does the human soul travel faster than light to the next world?”
 
No need to say Good Morning to me. Just answer my very early pre-dawn 4 am question which would be more educational to me.
 
The other day I was explaining to my nephew Lim Mingyang a Senior Consultant ENT Surgeon and Deputy Head of the ENT Dept at Tan Tock Seng in Singapore how Einstein came out with the theory that nothing that has mass can travel faster at or faster than the speed of light.
 
I then casually, literally joked with him unless the ‘object’ is a spirit or soul of a dead human that has no mass or some kind of an extra-terrestrial being from another world.
 
Then as an afterthought this may be a reality because there were many accounts written of people who died and have near-death experiences, and they came back to tell what was on the other side.
 
The first time I read of near-death experiences was when I read a book in 1975 called “Life after Life” by Dr Raymond Moody, a psychiatrist who recorded accounts of people who died and came back to tell what in the other world.
 


He recorded accounts of people across the world so different from each other by ethnicity, socially, culturally, educationally, and with different religions and belief systems, yet all described the same thing they saw, namely, initially travelling through a dark tunnel towards a very bright light at the end, and landing up in another world where they met their dead relatives.


There were many, many other accounts and stories told and written later by others too who died and returned. Here’s just one example.

 
Although I was jokingly mentioning this to my nephew 2 - 3 days ago, now having recalled what I read in Dr Raymond Moody book, and subsequently by other authors who are doctors who too wrote similar experiences of their patients who died and came back.
 

A Rethought:

 
I am now rethinking this possibility that the soul that has no mass like light may even to able to travel faster than light to the next world which we in astronomy know that the next nearest world could lie tens of hundreds or even thousands, if not millions or billions of light years away. But a soul could fly away there and return to this world in a jiff, faster than light?
 
This means, at least to me, a human soul of a dead person could easily travel far, far, far faster than light to the next world in just a few seconds or within a minute at most, and return to this world to tell his experience over there.
 
Just for your information, even light takes some 93 billion years to cross from one end of the Universe to the next, but in all probability our human soul once it leaves our body could “fly away” to another world in a femtosecond or in zero second that even light would take tens of thousands of years to arrive?
 
At least to me, this means our soul that has no mass do travel and does not die, so unlike our physical body that has a mass that dies, and stay put in this world on death.
 
Our physical body living or dead limits our speed, and we can never reach another world even using the fastest space ship  
 
I really do not know your vision, but this is clearly shown to me in this verse:
"The years of our life are three score and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years, yet most of them are labour and sorrow; for life is soon cut off and we FLY AWAY” (Psalm 90:10).
 
Does that clearly ring the bell, or are we still deaf and dull in thinking?
 
I want you in this chat group to think, think again, and yet again and come back to dialogue with me further on this issue? I want to hear and learn from you or anyone.
 
Here’s part of what I wrote and replied to Mingyang a few days ago when he asked me if I understood Einstein Theory of Relativity:
 
“As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass approaches infinity.
 
Because masses approach infinity with increasing speed, it is impossible to accelerate a material object to (or past) the speed of light. To do so would require an infinite amount of energy.
 
He showed this using this equation, hopefully I can write it down using WhatsApp’s here:
 
m = m 0 / square root of (1 – v/ c2)
 where, m is the mass of the moving object, m o, its initial velocity, v its velocity, and c, the velocity of light
 From this equation of Einstein, we can clearly see as an object increases its velocity (v) towards the speed of light (c), it tends toward 1 (v = c)
 When 1 minus 1 in the equation it becomes zero. Square root of zero is zero, and we cannot divide any number where the denominator is zero. It is not determinable, or the result tends towards infinity – even far more massive than the entire Universe itself which of course is impossible to achieve”.
 


Part II


 
After I sent out the above Part I into the chat group, I got a reply from my brother-in-law Ong Geok Soo who is a Senior Consultant Civil Engineer in Singapore to which I replied further below:
 

Dear brother Geok Soo,
 
Thank you for your thoughts when you wrote this: 
“I guess the first assumption is that the soul is weightless. Or it is near weightless? meaning it is very, very, light.
 
Second, is there a so call time tunnel existing somewhere, where if you get into it, one can zipped away to reach the new destination in, say, just a second even if this place is billions and billions of miles away.
 
If this so, I guess the speed of travel will be faster than the speed of light.
 
There is a time tunnel? I don't know. Cheers”
 
Ong Geok Soo
 
Thank you for your comment and question.
Let me try to answer you this with His Guidance.
In Einstein’s equation light has no mass


E2 = p2c2 + m2c4


According to Dr Christopher S Baird, in one of a question-and-answer sessions, the above equation, E represents the total energy of a particle, p is the momentum of the particle which is related to its motion, and c is the speed of light, and m is the mass of the particle.


 
This equation is derived from the relativistic definitions of the energy and momentum of a particle. The equation tells us that the total energy of a particle is a combination of its mass energy and its momentum energy, not necessarily related to its mass.


 
When a particle is at rest (p = 0), this general equation reduces down to the familiar E = mc2. But for a particle, say light or the soul of a dead human with no mass (m = 0), the general equation reduces down to E = pc.
 

Since the particles of light called photons have no mass, which I strongly believe is the same with the human soul, they must obey E = pc and therefore they must get all of their energy to travel from somewhere else.


 
Now there is an interesting additional effect contained in the general equation. If a particle has no mass (m = 0) and is at rest (p = 0), then the total energy is zero (E = 0). But an object with zero energy and zero mass is nothing at all according to Dr Christopher.

 
Therefore, if an object with no mass is to physically exist, it can never be at rest. Such is the case with light or perhaps our soul.

 
Furthermore, if an object travels at some speed v that is less than the universal speed limit c, we can always choose a reference frame traveling along with the object so that the object will be at rest in this reference frame.
 

Therefore, an object that has no mass like a soul or light (photons) can never be at rest but must always travel at the universal speed of light because this speed has the interesting characteristics that it can never rest (like a soul) which is an extension of my own personal belief about the soul.
 

As far as your idea of “time tunnel” I think this too exist for anything that has no mass that needs to travel through this tunnel or a “dark tunnel at the end was a bright light” as described by almost all people throughout the world who died and came back to tell their near-death experiences - irrespective of their race, religion, social, cultural or educational background after they underwent near-death experience. 
 
All of them described almost exactly the same thing they saw when they came back from death.  
 

Let me give you an analogy to illustrate using a field – astronomy and astrophysics I am familiar

 
We in this area of astronomy know that it may take billions of years for even light to travel from one world to the next.  But astrophysicists speak of the existence of wormholes that may exist, that we may use to tunnel our way through to short-cut this horrendously vast distances in just a fraction of a second.

 
Time Tunnel, Wormholes and Hyperspace:

 
Let me explain using a parable.
Imagine we have a very huge sheet of paper say 10 km wide. Imagine we put two points, one each at the end of this immensely huge paper, and we try to connect these two points.
 

This may be possible, but it is going to be very laborious and time-consuming to draw a line 10 km long to connect them.
Instead of traveling like light between these two points, why not just fold-up this huge paper in such a way that these two points are in direct contact?
 

There we are, we have already solved the problem. The two points or worlds are already in instant contact with each other, and we need not draw a line 10 km long across the paper to connect the two points.
 

In short, we have already found a way to wrap up the immensities of time and space together instantly, some kind of time-space warp. Does that make sense and ring the bell? 


Does Soul Exist?


First of all, an extremely, extremely difficult question confronting Science today is the existence of a soul? But I think most scientists do not believe in the existence of a soul or any entity they cannnot observe, detect or measure. 


We shall try to tackle this poser from the scientific view from my personal side. Let's have a look.

The best way to answer this question as any rational thinking scientist would is this. Imagine a person was alive at one moment, and he suddenly dies either due to a cardiac arrest, a sudden accident, or a slow lingering death from a chronic incurable disease. The next question any scientific mind would ask is this. Where did that life go? He / she was clearly alive and living moments ago, a week, a month or a year ago, but he was no longer alive or living anymore. Where did he go? What was 'that something' living inside his / her body one moment then suddenly left him / her leaving only his physical body. There must be something 'living inside' his physical body that made him or her breathe, move and was conscious. Then what happened? Why was he / her unable to show those characteristics of something that was alive and living anymore? There must be 'something' there inside him / her  that has left him that made his entire chemistry of life no longer able to proceed by themselves to show all those characteristics of life or something living? 

This is not just very rational scientific thinking and questioning by any right thinking man or woman of science, but all ancient civilizations and cultures  throughout the world in their wisdom do the same. All these civilizations even before rational scientific thinking was evolved already believed and accepted that a soul exists, else no physical body by itself can become alive, live for a few years and leave him / her. This phenomenon apples not just to humans or only for human souls, but for anything that creeps, breathes, feeds and multiples itself automatically  

The Bible tells us that the living body consists of physical body, a soul and spirit.

 
Even from the very beginning itself, the presence of a ‘soul’ has already been revealed to us.
 

“And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis: 2:7). 



In short, a human body is not just made up of some chemical elements from the soil, but he needs to have a soul to be living. 

 
(This is just like giving two rescue breaths to an unconscious victim whose breathing may have stopped during a cardiac arrest after every 15 chest compressions when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed).


Let's have a look at how this verse works from a scientific point of view.


Astronomers tell us that we are made from star dusts generated from supernovae explosions in stars. These dusts then arrived on Earth were made up of the same elements as found in the chemical periodic table of Dmitri Mendeleev. 



These elements such as potassium, sodium, calcium, iron, nitrogen, phosphorus, etc..., together with hydrogen, and oxygen in the water enter into the soil which then make up the chemical composition of the human body.


However, these elements by themselves are not alive or living as much as a dead body containing these elements that make up the various organic and inorganic chemical compounds including proteins, sugars, fats, DNA and nucleic acids, etc, etc, being non-living. 


They need something else far more than mere chemical elements and chemical compounds to trigger them into life so that they can fall within one of the over 100 definitions of life, even though most of these biological definitions are still not satisfactory.



Definition of Life:

 

Scientists have since attempted to define life for at least 500 years, and there are now over 100 different variations in its definition, the most common ones being, it moves, it reproduces, it respires, it feeds, it responds to stimuli, such as the popular acronym MRS GREN to mean Movement, Respiration, Sensitivity, Growth, Reproduction, Excretion and Nutrition.

 

But these are just characteristic or properties of a living organism, not the definition of life itself.

 

They only describe the characteristics or behavior of something living, not the precise description of life per sec

 

What we need in its definition is what exactly is this entity that causes something living to display these characteristics given in the acronym MRS GREN?

 

Unfortunately, no one this far has the answer, let alone its exact definition.

 

The description of some characteristics, features, behavior, requirements are just the effects of something living. They still do not tell us or define the precise cause or causes that result in these characteristics.

 

Because scientists have no clue what causes something to become alive, they try to avoid answering this question let alone come up with a precise definition.

 

But they know with complete certainty that life exists by observing their presence through their actions, behavior, requirements and characteristics, but they cannot measure them, or what causes them to display these features.

 

Hence, they do not have a proper and specific definition for it, and thus they try to avoid answering this question.

 

Obviously, they cannot see, detect, feel, let alone measure the presence of an entity called ‘soul’ or a ‘vital force’ that causes a living organism to creep, crawl, feed, breathe, grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce itself, they try not to answer this very question that gave themselves life to read and understand this very sentence being typed (for instance)!        


Hence, there must be an undefined entity unknown to science outside the physical body (made from these elements and chemical compounds in the soil) that need to be pumped into them for them to come to life.


Once biologically and spiritually-activated they trigger off the normal biochemistry of something living. 


This to me is the breath of God that has no mass, and this represents the soul of the body residing inside as long as it has not left the body. 


This means, the most important ingredient to life is not all those thousands of chemical compounds including DNA and nucleic acids, hormones, enzymes, etc, etc and their various actions and interactions in the body as most scientists think, but the soul that commands them all. 


Once the soul or the breath of God leaves them, all their chemistries without any more guidance, stop instantly and break down to return to the soil from where they came. 

"In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shall thou return"   

(Genesis 3:19) 


Does that not sound scientifically logical that bread (food) drives the various metabolic pathways and cellular signallings in our body but does not last long without something else much higher that commands their chemistries and pathways. 



The verse "breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul" clearly tells us these elements in the soil (claimed by astronomers to arrive as star dusts from another star or stars through their supernovae explosions), at least to me, need to be activated once again through the life-giving breath of God for them to become a living soul which means this:
 

chemical elements + life energy force (God's breath) = physical body + soul = A living body with a living soul.


These elements arriving from other stellar systems seem to suggest to me that there may be life existing elsewhere till they are destroyed by supernovae explosions, and they need to be activated once again into life on arrival into our soil. 


See further explanation here:


 “The Mystery of Life”:


2. Jesus First Miracle:




Besides the above scientific explanation, there are also many other verses given in the Bible indicating the presence of a soul in a body, but we shall quote just a few examples:


"May your whole spirit, soul and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus" (I Thessalonians 5:23).
 

Our material bodies are evident, but our souls and spirits are less distinguishable.


"And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell."
(Matthew 10:28).

 
“For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul?” (Matthew 16:26).
 
Even in the last Book in the Bible the word “soul” is repeated as in Genesis.
 

“When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne” (Revelation 6:9)
 
 

The Soul that Flies:

 
The presence of a soul in a human body is thus undisputable, but can it depart from the physical body and fly away on death?
 
Most people associate death as something physical in that the body just drop down dead and becomes motionless on the ground. This is true for a physical body, but not for the soul
 
We need to bring back Psalm 90:10 where it clearly tells us:
 
“The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years, yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we FLY AWAY”
 
To most people a dead body cannot even move, let alone FLY AWAY if this verse was interpreted literally
 
It is so obvious to me at least, there must be an entity within us that neither has a mass, nor can it be seen, detected or measured that instantly leaves our body on physical death and flies away.

Life’s Most Important Ingredient:

 

All scientists, doctors, and nutritionists when asked which is the most important ingredient besides air and water needed to keep a body alive, all will perhaps instantly name food and nutrition.

 

As a member of the above professions myself, I do not think so. I think we are all wrong.

 

As I have already explained undoubtably the presence of a soul in us, I think the soul un-hesitantly is the single most important entity that keeps our physical body alive, with all its physiological and biochemical functions intact, and in perfect coordination and working order

 

At least to me our soul is the only eternal partner we have being given, endowed in us that faithfully keeps us alive, laboring together with us till it departs and flies away as described in Psalm 90:10.

 

No other human partner has shown such tribute and faithfulness as our own soul

 

We need to cherish, nourish and be very grateful to the presence of a soul in our physical body every moment of our life, and not let it depart from us, for the very instant it does, we die and return to the soil from where we came without God’s life-giving breath being pumped into the elements of the soil anymore.

 

It is definitely not the food we eat and the water we drink that merely physically sustain us, but our own soul that both physically and spiritually keep us into existence

 

Just do not allow it to depart from our body and fly away  


Societal Beliefs on Death and the Soul: 


 Having described what I feel about the presence of a soul from biblical revelation, and other religious belief systems, and also in the eyes of science as a scientist, someone then asked me how does that fit in with thousands of years of other ethinic, and ancient cultural and societal beliefs who do not have clue in modern science or blessed in religious system ?  

 

Before we answer this question, let us give an illustration.

 

Imagine a developer builds a house from bricks, sand and soil. On completion, the house is just like an empty shell without anyone living inside. It would be dark with no light, lack of sound, lack of anything living there, lack of movement, or any evidence of life within. It would be like an empty shell left behind by a shell-fish that once lived inside found on the seashore.

 

Imagine we have a family now moving in to stay there. There would now be an obvious difference between an empty house and one that is now living. There will be lights, sound, laughter, cries, physical activities, and movements of someone living within. That’s the presence of life inside.

 

Suppose now we have a situation where the family stays there for a very short while and decides to shift out and stays somewhere else better and more permanent. It would be just like a situation when we leave this world and go on to stay in the next world.

 

In such a scenario, the temporary house they once stayed would once again become lifeless, dark, soundless, and empty. That house is now dead, representing a lifeless empty body left behind by someone who once lived inside. It is now an empty shell.

 

This is similar to a man when he was first created from the soil. He was lifeless, till God (the Creator and Developer) breathed into his nostrils, and man became a living soul, meaning the presence of a physical body (empty house) with a soul (life) within. The body became a living soul (Genesis 2:7), and when he dies, he returns to the soil from where he was created. He left behind a shell once again, evidence of a foot-print.

 

Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return (Genesis 3:19).

 

 

Having illustrated that, let us now look at how society collectively describes death?

 


In all civilizations, nations, ethnicities, cultures, belief systems, religions, ancient till the present, normally they do not describe death with words like “finished, does not exist anymore, disappeared forever, no such person, extinguished, no trace, no evidence of such person existed…etc.”

 

In every society throughout the world, their belief systems tell them that the person has merely passed on through this world and has left for another world, and that the physical body was just his temporary home for him for a few short years.

 

They would use euphemisms like “he has moved on, he left us, he passed on or passed away, his soul has left to rest in peace, rested in peace, eternal rest, asleep, departed, slipped away, gave up the ghost, breathed his last in this world, called home, went away to be with the Lord and Creator, went to a better place.

 

Here we are talking about western belief systems and their cultures. Even here in the East in Malaysia among the Malays and Chinese, the Malays normally describe someone who has died as “meninggal dunia” meaning “has left this world”, and the Chinese would describe it as “kuih sin” meaning “has passed through this physical body - came from somewhere, and has now passed through this physical body”


According to a source, Hinduism too believes in some kind of reincarnation after death in that life cannot be destroyed.


“Most Hindus believe that humans are in a cycle of death and rebirth called samsara. When a person dies, their atman is reborn in a different body.



Some believe rebirth happens directly at death, others believe that an atman may exist in other realms. Hindus believe that an atman may enter swarg or narak for a period before rebirth.



Some Hindus believe that humans may be reborn in animal form, and that rebirth from human to animal form only occurs if an atman has repeatedly failed to learn lessons in human form.



Living life according to teachings in the scriptures will eventually lead to moksha. Some Hindu scriptures describe moksha as the atman becoming absorbed with Brahman, from where each atman is believed to originate”



Hindus in Malaysia and elsewhere too believe in karma or 'intentional action'. Many believe good or bad actions in life leading to positive or negative merit, determines the atman's rebirth.


Among the Buddhists in Malaysia and elsewhere in a book What the Buddha Taught (1959), Theravada scholar Walpola Rahula asked,

"If we can understand that in this life we can continue without a permanent, unchanging substance like Self or Soul, why can't we understand that those forces themselves can continue without a Self or Soul behind them after the non-functioning of the body?"

"When this physical body is no longer capable of functioning, energies do not die with it, but continue to take some other shape or form, which we call another life. ... Physical and mental energies which constitute the so-called being have within themselves the power to take a new form, and grow gradually and gather force to the full.

"Famous Tibetan teacher Chogyam Trunpa Rinpoche once observed that what gets reborn is our neurosis--our habits of suffering and dissatisfaction. And Zen teacher John Daido Loori said: "... the Buddha’s experience was that when you go beyond the skandhas, beyond the aggregates, what remains is nothing. The self is an idea, a mental construct. That is not only the Buddha’s experience, but the experience of each realized Buddhist man and woman from 2,500 years ago to the present day" 


"That being the case, what is it that dies? There is no question that when this physical body is no longer capable of functioning, the energies within it, the atoms and molecules it is made up of, don’t die with it. They take on another form, another shape. You can call that another life, but as there is no permanent, unchanging substance, nothing passes from one moment to the next.

Quite obviously, nothing permanent or unchanging can pass or transmigrate from one life to the next. Being born and dying continues unbroken but changes every moment."


The Chinese may describe death as like the empty house that once was living until someone staying there has shifted elsewhere or passes away.


Similarly, it is like a hollow seashell found on the seashore, a fossil remains, fragments of DNA or some skeletons left behind as footprints of something existing inside previously.


 


The Lamps of Life:



Whatever our cultural, societal, spiritual or religious system of beliefs over the thousands of years, let us put this in another way as a parable to make this easier to understand. It is like this. 



Take an analogy or a parable of thousands or millions of unlit lamps in endless rows. All the lamps were initially dark and unlit. Then came a flame (the spark of life) that lit up the first lamp to begin life.


Let us consider the first lamp of life originated from the breath of God, and let this be the first lamp to light up other unlit lamps.


The first lamp then passes on the flame of life to the next unlit lamp to start a different lamp slightly different in color and brightness from the first one. The second one then passes the flame over to the third lamp, and so on. 


The lamp represents the body. The oil in the lamp represents the fuel from the food we eat that powers the chemistry of life and the different metabolic  pathways they take in the body.  


The flame, heat and the warmth  emitted represent life and something living, whereas the light represents the soul of the lamp. 

 

When the lamp (life) is extinguished, the life is snuffed out, but the heat from the lamp as energy escapes and flies away like the soul


Life and the soul is like matter and energy interrelationship according to Einstein's famous equation, E = mc2, that can never be destroyed, but enters into a state of thermodynamic equilibrium. 


This  represents the breath of God that can never be destroyed but returns to Him on death.


“What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder”

 

(Mark 10:9)



By the time tens of thousands or millions of lamps were lit, they all had different colors, brightness, stability, length of life, etc. The first generations of lamps would then have exhausted its fuel by the time several hundreds of other lamps were lit.


 

Most of them would have exhausted their fuel, and the lamps were extinguished (died, like all animals including the dinosaurs). Then the second wave of earlier lamps died off, and so on.

As  the flame lit up all the millions of lamps, new and more adaptable lamps would have been created to last longer. Life on earth is exactly like that with better and better species being evolved.


The Genesis and evolution of life:



But in the beginning (Genesis), only a few lamps of limited edition were available to light up the place (Earth). It was only through repeated multiplication - (‘multiply and be fruitful’ as God ordered) that millions of lamps (millions of species of life) were all lighted up into different colors, shapes and brightness as in Darwin’s “Origin of the Species’ recorded.



If we look at the evolution of life in this light, how does Creation in Genesis conflict with the Evolution of Life as myopic scientists and lay people alike argue? Their argument is totally beyond me. To me, as I have explained here, there is order, and harmony between the two.

 

Evolution to me, is just an extension of the initial creation of life on Earth over a very long period:

 

What is a thousand years to man, is just a watch in the night for the Creator. All these were not done in a day (literally) as written in Genesis. Scientists misinterpret the Bible. Spiritual enlightenment is beyond the human understanding of scientists who insist only on objective measurements.

 

Further reading on:


The Apple in Bible: Lost in Transition here:

 

https://scientificlogic.blogspot.com/2010/09/apple-in-bible-lost-in-transition.html

 

Does not that speak volumes where we can have science, spiritual, cultural and societal beliefs in tremendous harmony with one another, rather than in antagonistic with each other? 

 

Others may argue on this issue till kingdom comes, but as for me this verse in Psalm 90:10 about our souls that flies away on physical death stand steadfast with me throughout eternity in time and space, even to the ends of their teethers where Universe (heavens) and our souls may lie. 

 

 


 

 

 

 



Auscultation: A Clinical Perspective

  Auscultation and the Stethoscope: A Clinical Perspective by: lin ru wu alias  lim ju boo Introduction: Auscultation is one of the most ven...