Dear Captain Lim Khoy Hing
How Far Can We See from a Height? Can we
actually see a city from a plane flying at 10,000 metres?
Before I ask my question, I have done some
home-work to come out with some data first to determine visibility of a place
on ground from a height, and also the distances between two locations along the
curvature of the Earth. My explanation first, and my question comes last below.
The Explanation:
The distance d in miles to the true horizon on
earth seen from a plane or from any height is approximately:
First Equation:
d = ?? (1.5 h), where h
= height in feet of the eye (?? = square root)
This is a very simple formula which is
applicable from most heights. Thus from an aircraft flying at 33,000 feet, then
the distance to the true horizon seen by a pilot or a passenger is 222.485
miles (358 km) away.
Standing on a hill or
tower of 100 feet high or even from an aircraft, the height (h) is much smaller
than the equatorial radius (R) of the Earth of 3963.189 statute miles (6,378.135
km).
The exact formula for distance from the
viewpoint to the horizon, applicable even for satellites, is:
Second Equation:
d = ?? (2Rh + h2),
where, (?? = square root)
d = distance is also the true distance to the
horizon from a height
R = Equatorial radius of the Earth (6,378,135
meters)
Applying the second equation, the horizon seen
from an aircraft flying at 10 km high would also be 357.299 km (222.0154 miles)
away.
The calculations using the above two formulae
give the straight-line distance from the plane cockpit, passenger pothole, or a
hill to the horizon, and NOT the distance to the horizon along the ground which
would be longer for low heights such as seen from a hill.
In the second equation, both the radius (R) of
the Earth, and the height (h) of the observer must be given in the same units
(e.g. kilometers), but any consistent units will work.
The above two formula for d is only for the
straight line of sight distance to the object of view, say the horizon.
A different relationship involves the arc length
distance s along the curved surface of the Earth to the bottom of object. In
this case, we apply:
The Third Equation:
l = cos-1 [r ?? (r + h)] x [2?? r ?? 360]
(?= square root)
where,
l = the distance from the observer to the
horizon along the curve (Great Circle) of the planet (Earth), along the ground
r (equatorial radius of Earth) = 6,378.135 km
h (height of plane) = 10,000 metres (10 km)
(r+h) = 6388.135 km
r ?? (r+h) = 0.998 434 597
Circumference of Earth (2?? x 6378.135 km) =
40075 km
2?? r ?? 360 = 111.3194559 km
Cos-1 [r ?? (r+h)] is the angle in degree
between the observer and the horizon, measured from the centre of Earth =
3.206324 degrees
Thus at an altitude of 10 km (33.000 ft) or 6.25
miles, the typical ceiling altitude of an jet airliner, the actual arc length
(l) along the curved surface of the Earth to the bottom of an object (say a
town) is 356.926 km (221.78 miles) away.
The distances along the curvature of Earth for low heights less
than that of a jet plane at 10,000 meters, it would be greater than that of a
direct line-of-vision. The ceiling altitude of 10 km of a jet liner is about
the limit where the straight line-of-vision of a pilot to the horizon slightly
exceeds the actual arc distance measured on the ground.
However, several calculations using varying measurements for the
radius of the Earth showed that the differences were less than a kilometer
provided the observer did not fly above that of a commercial jet plane.
The Limit of Comparative Distances:
At much further distances, say 150 - 300 km away as seen from a satellite, or
even further out as seen by a space traveler from outer space, say from the Moon,
and the extra distance due to the curvature of the Earth will become less and
less significant compared to the greater and greater distances or height away
from the Earth.
As an observer recedes into outer space, the distance to the
horizon continue to increase until it far exceeds even that of the entire
circumference of the Earth, let alone just a small extra arc of the curvature.
The observer could be light-seconds, light-minutes, or light hours away, while
the entire circumference of Earth is just only 0.133 light second round, if
light could whip around the Earth.
But for low heights, such as from a small hill, a tall building, a low flying
plane, or from a watch tower, the extra arc distance along the ground to the
horizon would always be greater than that of a straight line vision from above.
Actually the visual horizon is slightly further away than the calculated visual
horizon, due to the slight refraction of light rays due to the atmospheric
density. There may be also the effect of mirage playing tricks on the eyes,
lifting an invisible distant city above the horizon.
1 statute mile = 5,280 feet = 1,609 meters
Geographical Locations of Cities:
Location Longitude (E) Latitude (N)
Penang 100 0 15 50 25
Phuket 98 0 22 80 0
Kuala Lumpur 1010 41 30 9
Singapore 1030 51 10 17
Distances between Neighboring Cities:
Using the above geographical coordinates, and applying spherical trigonometry
or the Haversine formula, the shortest distances along the curvature of the
Earth between Malaysia and neighboring countries are:
Kuala Lumpur - Penang: 297.9 km = 185.1 statute miles = 160.8 nautical miles
Kuala Lumpur ?C Singapore: 318 km = 198 miles = 172 nautical miles
Penang - Phuket (South Thailand): 354.64 km = 220.36 miles = 191.49 nautical
miles
The Question Now:
Having calculated out the distances along the Great Circle of some of the towns
and cities between Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore, and we have shown that are
within the theoretical distances that can be seen from an aircraft flying
10,000 metres above the ground, can we actually see Penang and Singapore from
Kuala Lumpur, or Phuket above Penang from a plane flying at 10,000 meters over
these areas? We presume there is no blanket of cloud cover, and that the
weather is perfect with visibility up to infinity?
Frankly, I have never been able to locate where the horizon is
whenever I fly. All I saw were just sheets, and sheets of thick white clouds
below, and they stretched as far away as I could see. I seek your valuable
experience and your expert comments.
Thank you Captain.
JB Lim
Malaysia
Hi Dr JB Lim,
Thank you for the explanation on how to calculate the visibility of an object
on the ground from a particular height. Yes, pilots have been using the same
formula (First Equation) to work out the line-of-sight distance, not so much to
look at any particular object, but to find out the range when they could start
to receive a VHF radio transmission.
You see, VHF (Very High Frequency) radio transmissions travel in
a straight line and could not bend or follow the curvature of the Earth like
the HF (High Frequency) transmission could.
The latest weather of a particular airport is provided by the
ATIS (Aerodrome Terminal Information Service) transmitted on VHF. When I am flying
at 35,000 feet, I know that at around 220 nautical miles, I would be able to
receive the latest weather from the ATIS of an aerodrome.
In this sense, the formula you used to calculate the line of
sight distance is useful. As to actually see
a city from 220 nautical miles at 35,000 feet, it is not always possible to do
so even if the visibility is up to infinity (due to traces of haze or the
effect of oblique visibility).
Perhaps, at night, one may be able to see the lights of the
cities on a good day when the weather is perfect, but otherwise, just like you,
I would see sheets and sheets of thick white clouds below me most of the times!
However, if the cities were in the range of around 100 nautical miles, I
probably could see and recognize them in the horizon (crosschecking with the
radar on board if needed!)
No comments:
Post a Comment