Sunday, February 10, 2019

Why Chinese chose private hospitals over government hospitals in Malaysia




The following is a reply to one of the participants of my WhatsApp  group why he disagreed with me that the Chinese prefer to seek treatment in private hospital than in government hospitals because he believes doctors in government hospitals are incompetent, whereas my thinking was the Chinese are richer, and can afford to pay and avoid unbearable long queues and appointments in government hospitals.

Here’s my reply to him which maybe a bit too lengthy to reply through WhatsApp using a smart phone. I then chose using this blog of mine.

Dear Mr. HM Cheaw,

I thank you for your reasons why Chinese prefer to seek treatment in private hospitals instead of going to government hospitals.

Your reason that government doctors are not competent, and mine initial reason that Chinese are richer than other races may not necessarily be true.

You gave an example of a few cases of your bad experience in a government hospital. This may not be the view of the entire Chinese population of some  6 - 7 million out of a total population of 28.3 million people in Malaysia.

We can only get the true reason from a large scale randomized study through an opinion poll involving a very large segment of the Chinese population in Malaysia.

This can be done through questionnaire so that it can represent some 6 to 8 million or more Chinese in this country. The study should involve family members, the patients themselves and non-patients, standardized and randomized by age groups and gender.

My reason the Chinese are richer and can afford private treatment was just as presumptive as yours in that government doctors are inefficient, unprofessional and negligent.

This is just an assumption  because of a single bad experience your friend who underwent  an eye operation in a government hospital (I believe), until he had to be rushed to a private hospital for an emergency operation.

Your other reason was another friend of yours  in Kuala Kangsar who died due to low white blood count and fever when treated  in the government hospital for 3 months, and yet they were unable to  find the cause of his leucopenia (low WBC count).

You said he died because the government doctor punctured his lungs while taking his blood. It is not clear to me why the doctor need to take his blood from his lungs when he could easily draw blood through a veno-puncture from the inner bent of his arm? Maybe the doctor wanted to drain away fluid from his chest cavity?  

Your third bad experience was your son and many other patients you also mentioned
You claimed your son had low platelet count and that IMR was unable to detect the type of virus that cause the persistent fever. Again this is presumption.  Let me explain.

First, I really do not know how to explain in detail all these “mysteries” surrounding your dissatisfaction  and the  reasons why your friend died in a government hospital because you said the doctors there could not identify the disease or the problem.

Since I was using Whatsapp which is supposed to be for only videos, short stories and messages only, I thought it is easier for me  to discuss some of the possible reasons here for the benefit of a wider spectrum of readers 

But I shall try to explain some possible reasons as briefly as possible.


Leucopenia:



Secondly, there are many reasons to explain your friend’s leucopenia (low white blood count). Some of the causes  include  aplastic anemia, nutritional deficiencies, excessive destruction of blood cells by the spleen (hypersplenism), SLE (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or lupus, an autoimmune disorder), leukemia (blood cancer), and possibly AIDS and HIV besides in  rare cases,  Kostmann's syndrome (low neutrophil count), or other  myelodysplastic syndromes in Malaysia. But I am not sure as I need to see evidence-based data and records.


But having low blood count could also be anemia caused by cancer where his bone marrow was destroyed by cytotoxic drugs (chemotherapy) or by radiation. Which is which I have no idea?


All these can easily be differentiated by any  competent doctor in any hospital  using differential diagnosis based on history taking, clinical examination supported by haematological, serological and immunological and biochemistry.  All that is required is a doctor with good clinical acumen and good sense.

It is very unlikely that his months of hospitalization with all these investigations, and seen by so many specialists, they were unable to home in the cause. Naturally he will suffer from persistent fever because of his leucopenia.




Immunology:




His immunological system producing antibodies, and various immunoglobulins (IgA, IgE, IgD, Ig M…etc )  would be battling hard to take over to fight an infection. The fever itself is protective by producing heat against bacterial and pathogenic invasion. 

That was why as long as his WBC count was low, he would continue to have persistent fever as you said.  This is just simple  good  clinical sense.  

On your other compliant that other patients (or was it your son), having low platelet count or thrombocytopenia as it is medically called, and that the Institute for Medical Research  (IMR) was unable to identify the virus or the cause.

First of all,  let me explain that a low platelet count need not necessarily mean a viral infection. It is just one possibility.  

There are many aetiologies or causes as to why some have low platelet count
In Malaysia the most common cause (working on the epidemiological assumption on the incidence of tropical diseases) dengue would be one of the suspect.




Dengue or Viral: A Possibility:


In dengue you will find a drop in thrombocyte (platelet) count. I do not have the statistics off hand to specifically correlate the incidence of dengue fever with thrombocyte count at the moment  as I am busy typing this letter to you at the moment. But I can do a literature search. But this takes time, and I have no patience for this as I am only writing a simple reply to you, not conducting medical research that requires literature search in a medical library. 

But there are other causes too, not just dengue. Some of them include leukemia especially chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cancers that can invade the bone marrow.  Some maybe viral infections  such as chickenpox, parvovirus, hepatitis C, Epstein-Barr, and HIV.

Some thrombocytopenia can also be  caused by an  auto-immune disorders such as SLE (lupus), some are drug-induced, especially certain antibiotics, and drugs to manage cardiovascular and psycho-motor seizures.


Auto Immune Disorders:




But I think autoimmune disorders such as immune thrombocytopenia (idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or ITP) besides dengue, and certain viral infections may also  cause a low platelet count due to excessive destruction of blood components by the spleen. But I am not too sure as a study is also needed  to confirm, else we work only on assumptions.

But heavy and severe bacterial infections can lower the platelet count and cause an elevation of WBC. A low platelet count may also signal  exposure to toxic chemicals such as benzene that can destroy the bone marrow.




Nutritional:



But we do not know the real cause when you merely mentioned “low blood platelet” But there are also caused by nutritional deficiencies in vitamin B-12, folic acid, and iron although this may be less likely if they  are nutritionally adequate fed Chinese, and  living in Malaysia, unless they  drink too much alcohol.


Aplastic anemia is another consideration we need to look into.  In medicine there are so many possibilities. That’s how we conduct medical research. We cannot follow text-book knowledge especially some old editions.


But I think we can suspect dengue, because as I have explained earlier,  this is the most common communicable disease affecting tropical countries like Malaysia. Moreover you said your son recovered uneventfully which in most cases this is very typical with dengue or if it was caused by some kind of virus especially on the bone marrow.  

All other causes such as aplastic anemia or ITP are almost irreversible and intractable. This is clinical logic we can infer merely from what you said in your 2 -3 words for the medical history.




Serological and Molecular Assays:



But if you think it was a viral infection which even IMR could not identify, then this is not a surprise to me because viruses can mutate so fast that even conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase, or  hemagglutination  assays meant for viral detection  may not be specific enough if the virus changes its molecular signatures.


At the IMR as far as I know during my last visit there during the IMR Open Day last year (2018), they now use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method instead of the older ELISA.  Molecular sequencing of viral RNA and DNA genomes is the latest procedure a research institute like IMR would use to identify a specific strain of virus.


However, there is one difficulty. If a specific virus such as rhinoviruses (cold viruses) mutates as they always do - very fast, this changes their DNA genomic profile. This is just a simple example.




Genomic Data Base:



When they do, then scientists at IMR would not have the database of all known viruses to compare. If that is a new genomic signature, then how do you expect them to identify something that is not there in their database? So you cannot blame them. It would be something new to them - in fact a discovery.




Traditional Culture Diagnostic:

  
Even if it was bacterial and not viral infection that causes the thrombocytopenia they still can identify the bacteria or the cause using convention culture methods such as using MacConkey agar, eosin methylene blue, blood agar, mannitol salt agar…etc. and observing colour  changes or gas formation.
These are the traditional assays which I remember learning during my student days in bacteriology and microbiology practical classes.


But for very difficult to identify and new bacteria or any pathogens, IMR will switch to the much more advanced and sophisticated molecular assays such as PCR. This is not a problem for them. The Head of the Bacteriology Division at IMR told me  they have the capability of using molecular assays  when I visited them during their  Open Day in October last year.

So if you think it was either bacterial or a viral infection such as dengue that caused your son low blood count, then it could be a new strain not in the genomic database. This is what I feel. But there may be other possibilities which I cannot think of at this moment.




Being Scientifically Unbias:


I am not trying to defend government hospitals over private hospitals or their doctors.  But I am sure the government hospital or hospitals where you have the bad experience is not that incompetent as that. I am sure they have their specialists and expertise to look into all these possibilities I have briefly explained above. It is a matter of having a very good clinical acumen supported by lab investigations for which the IMR has all those sophistication as it is the National Diagnostic Laboratory.


I hope you would not be discouraged using government hospitals based on assumptions that the doctors there are not competent.

Of course my former colleague Dr. Rita Gregory here in this chat group recently sent us an article something like a law suit against the Kuala Lumpur Hospital (KLH) and the doctors there who attended to  a very senior physician, in fact a former  head of medical department at KLH whom Dr Rita  knows. Dr. Rita was  a Consultant Haematologist at IMR. Her opinion is very valuable

The private hospital diagnosed it as  septic arthritis, but  when she was referred to KLH, the doctors there insisted it was OA (osteoarthritis).




A Case of Misdiagnosis:


It was already diagnosed as infective arthritis in a private hospital,  but she was referred to KLH,  the incompetency of the doctors there  reverse that diagnosis and treated her as a case of OA. She died because of that. Now there is a law suit against the doctors and  KLH since KLH is such a major hospital, and biggest one in the country too.

The clinical presentation and features of sepsis of the joints is different from those of OA that any doctor can almost instantly differentiate between the two. But we will not go into that.


Study Needed:



In conclusion, it is not safe to assume. Neither should I assume that all Chinese are rich to afford going only to private hospitals, and Malays and Indians less so, thus they mainly go to government hospital s and other government health clinics. This is just guesswork.

A study using questionnaire for an opinion poll is needed to know why various races chose various hospitals.


My Personal Choice:



I am a Chinese, and I chose to go only to a government hospital because I am not rich, and I cannot afford to be warded in a private hospital for 5 months like I did for a venous stasis last year. It would have cost me at least Ringgit one million, whereas I got it completely free-of-charge  in a one-room with bath attached in a first class ward. It was as simple as that!


I hope I have enlightened you, Mr. HM Cheaw!  


Lim ju boo

(A former medical researcher at IMR)

Friday, February 1, 2019

WHO article on Palm Oil insults our Malaysian scientists.


WHO article on Palm Oil insults our scientists.




I felt sickeningly surprised that WHO which is regarded as the world authority on matters pertaining to health has published  such an article without first referring to what our scientists have published through their hard work.


In fact I was also one of the medical researchers who were also involved in the study. It was in the year 1987 till 1990.


I lead a powerful scientific and clinical team as the Chief Coordinator and Principal Investigator to prove that our Malaysian palm oil does not cause heart disease as the American Soybean Association claimed?  


They lobbied against our oil as tropical oil that is harmful to the health.  That damaging lobbying caused our country, Malaysia to lose tens of hundreds of millions of ringgit yearly.


The then Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM) then sent high powered scientific and marketing teams  to America several times to explain, but no avail. The Americans wanted us to prove that our palm oil was a health-promoting oil through proper scientific studies.


At that time I have just returned from the UK with my PhD.  I was then called by the Director of the Institute for Medical Research (IMR) in Kuala Lumpur to lead a research team who could support our claims that our palm oil was actually a health-promoting oil, not what the American Soybean Association believe.


For this, we required scientific data as evidence. It was a very tough challenge for me. I have little clue how to proceed to make it impervious to attack.


Initially I declined the offer as it was too tough a challenge against the Americans.


It was then I was provided with a very powerful team to help me. The team was assembled.  But we soon quarreled a lot over minor technical details in countless technical meetings on how to proceed in the investigations.


It was very tough and very stressful for me. The methodology and procedure MUST be atomic bomb proof and impermeable to all attacks so that no one, NOT EVEN the Americans with their much higher and far more advanced scientific know-how can criticize our method and throw our findings away?


I thought of this challenge for months. My Director at IMR told me to be confident with my postgraduate training in various British universities


Then I decided I must make use of my training at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) at Cambridge, USA instead to defend myself and my colleagues who were going to work together in this difficult challenge.


I suppose my Director at the IMR knew this, and realize my potential at MIT.


My colleagues and I then turned the table round against the very powerful American lobbyists. But it took us our best scientific effort initially involving over 30 scientific, clinical and medical specialists.

Later we selected just 6 of us after so much of disagreement in the clinical procedure 


 It was a very difficult and stressful study for us.  Before we could proceed, we have to submit our investigation protocol to get clearance for safety reasons.


Our research team had to face some 30 members of the Malaysian Medical Ethics Committee. They interviewed us twice on separate occasions for hours each separate occasion. .

 It was on the safety of the human volunteers in the clinical trial. The Attorney General (AG) was also sitting there as a Legal Adviser to the Government.


The Government in that Medical Ethics Committee was represented by the Attorney General to ensure that the Government would not be sued if death occurred, or injuries incurred, or  if anything that went wrong should we conduct the medical experiment.


It took us some two years of planning to conduct the trial.


But  that effort was in written in gold in the journal  that saved my beloved country - Malaysia billions of Ringgits in trade revenue after we published our findings in the very hard to enter

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in May, 1991 here:


But see, what WHO has done to us again. This is an insult to all of us and to all other researchers who came after us.  

Why must they do this to us? I am angry as I am proud of my country and her talents 

jb lim




You Are Welcome Ir. CK Cheong

 Dear Ir. CK Cheong, Thank you for your kind words and encouraging comments in the comment column under:  "A Poser: Can Excessive Intak...