Dear friends in this Whatsapp Chat Group
Our tutor Dr. Susan Gurney at the University of Cambridge
has asked us students from various countries around the world to write a
summary of the legal system in each of our respective country.
This is just as one of the many daily and weekly tasks we need to undertake and submit as part of our
course in forensic investigation (forensic toxicology)
This is a wake up call for me as I have no clue myself, and I
am sure you too have not much clue as most of us are not in the legal
profession
So I like to share my knowledge with you to wake you up
also.
This is the beauty of a chat group where we can share
knowledge after a research
Unfortunately a lot send rubbish
and videos to us in chat groups.
So I need to neutralize them with something that is solidly academic.
Legal System in Malaysia (Part 1)
by Lim Ju Boo - Saturday, 15 February 2020, 7:15 PM
Dear Dr. Susan
You have asked me a very difficult question as I am not in
the legal field, and I really do not have much idea how our legal system in
Malaysia works.
But I shall try my level best using plain simple language
from sources I read here and there and understand.
The legal system in my country, Malaysia is very complex
It is mainly based on the common law legal system.
But there are also state laws enacted by the State
Legislative Assemblies which applies in the particular state.
The constitution of Malaysia also provides for a unique dual
justice system—the secular laws (criminal and civil) and sharia (Islamic) laws
even though there a controversy whether or not Malaysia is a secular or an
Islamic country since it is a multiracial country for sure with many types of
religion being practiced here even though the majority of the population are
Muslims
The reason why the law of Malaysia is mainly based on the
common law legal system was because it is the direct result of the colonization
of Malaya, Sarawak, and North Borneo by Britain between the early 19th century
to 1960s.
However, the supreme law of the land is the Constitution of
Malaysia that sets out the major legal framework and rights of all Malaysian
citizens.
The Federal laws are enacted by Parliament of Malaysia and
this applies throughout the country even though it may have a dual system.
Then there are also state laws enacted by the State
Legislative Assemblies which applies in the particular state
On the dual system of law in this country this is provided
in Article 121(1A) of the Constitution of Malaysia.
Article 3 also provides that Islamic law is a state law
matter with the exception for the Federal Territories of Malaysia.
Islamic law refers to
sharia law, and in Malaysia it is known and spelled as syariah. The court is
known as the Syariah Court.
Looking at the Malaysian legal system as a whole, sharia law
plays a relatively small role in defining the laws on the country. It only
applies to Muslims.
With regards to civil law, the Syariah courts has
jurisdiction in personal law matters, for example pertaining to marriage,
inheritance, and apostasy.
In some states there are sharia criminal laws, for example
there is the Kelantan Syariah Criminal Code Enactment 1993.
Their jurisdiction is however limited to imposing fines for
an amount not more than RM 5000 (925.33 Pound sterling) and imprisonment to not
more than 3 years.
They cannot impose capital or death sentence on any criminal
or murder cases such as in Alex and Linda hypothetical murder case Cambridge University gave us.
Such cases has to be referred to the High Court, then to the Appeal Court and finally the Federal
(Supreme) Court that will have the final say by applying the Federal
Constitution, the highest Constitution of the land that applies to all major
criminal and murder cases
In August 2007, the
then Chief Justice of Malaysia proposed to replace the current common law
application in Malaysia with sharia law, but this was turned down
I am a long retired medical researcher, not in the legal
profession. So I hope I have summarized something out of my field to the best
of my ability.
Thank you
--------------------------------------
Dear Dr. Susan,
Part 2
Just some further information on what I have written earlier
at the 5th week student forum
The hierarchy of courts in this country (Malaysia) begins
from the lowest court, namely the Magistrates' Court where minor offences like
stealing, traffic offences, burning rubbish in public, and owners of dogs
allowing them to chase and bite others are heard here.
The next higher court is the Sessions Court where cases on
civil matter involving motor vehicle accidents, disputes between landlord and
tenant and distress action and other matters where the amount in dispute does
not exceed RM 250,000.00 are heard here.
In the Malaysian legal system, for more serious offenses
such as drug and human trafficking, and murder cases that may result in a
capital punishment (death sentence) they are then referred to the High Courts
If a convicted person is not happy with the sentence hand
down by a High Court, he / she may appeal to the next highest court which is
the Court of Appeal where the sentence of the lower court (magistrate and
session courts) may be upheld or overturned
If he is still not satisfied, he / she may also have his /
her case heard in the highest court that is, the Federal Court which is the
apex or the Supreme Court of the land
But if any judgment by the apex court (Federal Court) is
handed down, then there is no more further avenues available for him / her to
appeal. Then that sentence including a death sentence is confirmed
In Malaysia currently death sentence is imposed for drug
trafficking, murder, kidnapping, human smuggling, treason against the King and
country, and other similar serious offences
However they are now trying to have the capital sentence
(death sentence) abolished
But this has caused a tremendous outcry among some sectors
of the public especially among members of families whose loved ones were
murdered - quite understandable.
In fact some families publicly said that if the death
sentence is abolished, and if the murderer of their family members was let off
the gallows, they themselves would personally kill the murderer. They blamed
government as insensitive
So the decision whether or not to abolish the death sentence
in this country is still being debated, maybe abolished only for some other
offences such as for drug offences
In Malaysia we currently do not have a jury system anymore.
We had one but it was abolished in 1995
Hence if a death sentence is heard in the apex court
(Federal Court), instead of a jury, 2 or 3 or even more senior judges will sit
on the bench to make the decision
That sentence will be final
Thank you for your question.
It has helped me to learn something about our own legal system which I
never knew before