Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Why Is Traditional Medicine So Popular and Acceptable by Over 80 % of the World Population?

 

A friend sent us a video via WhatsApp telling how Japanese doctors treat their patients by prescribing nutrition as dietary medicine, exercise, avoiding alcohol and lifestyle changes for disease-free living and for their world-record longevity. But elsewhere doctors prescribe chemical drugs as 'medicines' for 'curing' diseases and for 'longevity'  

There is also another Japanese doctor by the name of Yukie Niwa, M.D., D.M.S PhD who wrote at least two books:  

1.      “Drugs Do Not Cure Disease” 

2.      “Free Radicals Invites Death”

Dr Niwa is not just an ordinary medical doctor, but he is also a medical researcher with numerous research papers behind his name. He is also consultant immunologist to several hospitals in Tokyo, and Head of the Institute of Immunology in Tokyo. He strongly condemns the use of drugs for treating disease as used in conventional allopathic medicine.

See also these two comics attached among many similar ones.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lllrm5_iGRY

https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/comments/1gh1mce/pills_are_convenient/?rdt=63513

This sets me to write this article that I wish to dedicate to all healthcare professionals

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 80% of the global population continues to rely on traditional medicine for healthcare needs. Why is that when we have modern medicine these days? There must be some reasons behind this. This is seen not just in African and Asian countries, but throughout the world including highly educated individuals in advanced countries like in China, Japan, South Korea, United States, United Kingdom, all the way down to the south in Australia and New Zealand. literally the entire world, and they are here to stay, encouraged and promoted by WHO itself including here in Malaysia.

In the 1980’s I sat as a member of a very powerful policy-making and expert committee – The Joint WHO-Ministry of Health-Institute for Medical Research Expert Technical Committee.

I sat on this high-powered policy-making committee for 6 years till my retirement in 1994 after which others took over. The government in that Committee with the advice of WHO wanted to integrate traditional and complementary medicine into the mainstream health care system of this country. This today has effectively come into place, legally and officially by an Act of Parliament.  As a result of the legal recognition of traditional and complementary medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Indian Ayurvedic Medicine, alongside with western homeopathic, naturopathic, osteopathic and chiropractic medicines are very popular today in Malaysia, especially TCM  

This trend of seeking traditional health care and treatment is not only seen in less educated individuals but even among doctors and clinicians who were my doctors’ colleagues who went to traditional healers rather than seeking other medical doctors for help when they are sick.

Just to give two examples of doctors I know – one was my own medical colleague who in one of our casual morning chit chats told us that when she is sick, she will never take any of the prescribed drugs. She would find other means of treatment from outside. She told us she will prescribe all these drugs only for her patients, but not take them for herself.

Another example was a Senior Consultant Psychiatrist, who was the Head of the Dept of Psychological Medicine at the University of Malaya. He later became a Consultant Psychiatrist to WHO. We knew each other very closely since our college days in the 1960’s. He was complaining to me about some chronic pain he had for years, and despite being a specialist clinician himself trained in western scientific medicine, none of the rheumatologists could help him. He told me he then went to Tung Shin Hospital in Kuala Lumpur to seek treatment from a Traditional Chinese Physician. He was completely amazed his years of chronic pains completely went away after just a few sessions. What’s more, he told me it was very cheap too – only some RM 30 per session of treatment. He told me secretly he cursed his own type of scientific allopathic medicine using painkillers that never cured him. There were many other similar stories told to me by my own colleagues who were all medical doctors.   

There are several reasons behind this phenomenon, even in the presence of modern medicine. Let us have a look at some of the reasons why a whopping over 80 % of the world population seek traditional medicine or other systems of medicine over conventional drug-based medicine. Here are some reasons:  

Cultural and Historical Roots

Traditional medicine is deeply embedded in the cultures and histories of many societies. Practices such as Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Unani, and indigenous healing systems have been passed down through generations and are viewed as integral to cultural identity. Many people trust these systems because they are in line with their cultural beliefs and practices.

Accessibility and Affordability:

Modern medicine is often costly and may not be readily available, especially in rural or underserved areas. Traditional medicine practitioners are more accessible in many regions, and their services are usually more affordable. For example, in many parts of Africa, Asia, and South America, herbal medicine and traditional healers serve as the first point of contact for healthcare. Nevertheless, even in the United States, the UK and in Europe where modern health care is easily accessible, there are lots of people there who still go for alternative, complementary or integrated treatment. The Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine (RLHIM) in the heart of London in Great Ormond Street
London near the famous Children Hospital is just an example.

Long Wait:

In Malaysian hospitals there  is always a very long waiting time, typically about 2 -3 months just to get an appointment to  see a specialist, and even on the day of appointment there is a very long queue and waiting time, often as long as 5 -6 hours just to see the medical specialist, after which another 45 – 90 minutes just to get the medicine, most of the  time the same medicine that have not cured them in all the past visits The appointment time and the day of appointment is so ridiculously long that it puts patients off.  Patients go away to seek traditional or other alternative medical treatments.

Perceived Safety and Natural Appeal:

Many individuals perceive traditional medicine, especially herbal remedies, as "natural" and therefore safer than synthetic drugs. While this belief isn't always scientifically accurate, it is the same with those who are wary of the side effects associated with some modern medications.

Holistic Approach:

Traditional medicine often takes a holistic view of health, addressing not just physical symptoms but also emotional, spiritual, and social well-being. This approach appeals to individuals seeking more personalized and comprehensive care than what is sometimes offered in modern medicine.

Chronic Diseases and Complementary Use:

Modern medicine excels in acute care and life-threatening conditions such as in a medical emergency where quick intervention is very crucial, but often struggle with managing chronic diseases or conditions where symptoms are recurrent and quality of life is affected (e.g., arthritis, migraines). Traditional therapies are often sought as complementary treatments to alleviate symptoms, improve well-being, or fill gaps in care.

Trust in Traditional Healers:

Traditional healers are often respected figures within their communities, offering not just medical help but also emotional and social support. This trust is a significant factor in why people continue to turn to traditional medicine.

Limited Awareness or Acceptance of Modern Medicine:

In some areas, there is limited knowledge about or access to modern medical practices. In others, there is mistrust or scepticism about the pharmaceutical industry, leading people to rely on traditional practices they believe to be more transparent or associated with their values.

Integrative Medicine Trends:

Interestingly, there is a growing movement in modern healthcare systems to integrate traditional practices. For instance, acupuncture, rooted in TCM, is now widely recognized and practiced in Western healthcare for pain management.

Herbal supplements and remedies are often included in integrative medicine to complement standard treatments. This integration helps bridge the gap between traditional and modern approaches, making traditional practices more acceptable even in modern contexts.

Interestingly, there is a growing movement in modern healthcare systems to integrate traditional practices. For instance:

1.      Acupuncture, rooted in TCM, is now widely recognized and practiced in Western healthcare for pain management.

2.      Herbal supplements and remedies are often included in integrative medicine to complement standard treatments.

The availability of TCM in government hospitals in Malaysia today is just an example of such integration of traditional medicine into the mainstream healthcare system

This integration helps bridge the gap between traditional and modern approaches, making traditional practices more acceptable even in modern contexts.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs:

For some individuals, health and illness are deeply intertwined with religious or spiritual beliefs. Traditional medicine often incorporates spiritual rituals, which bring into line with the patient’s worldview and faith, offering comfort that modern medicine may not provide.

Challenges in Modern Healthcare:

Modern healthcare faces issues such as, high costs. over-reliance on pharmaceuticals, and systemic inefficiencies These challenges may lead some people to explore traditional options as more practical or relatable alternatives.

Future of Traditional and Modern Medicine:

The coexistence of traditional and modern medicine highlights the need for research into the efficacy and safety of traditional practices. Promoting evidence-based integration of these systems can enhance global healthcare. For instance, initiatives by WHO and other organizations aim to standardize and validate traditional medicine, ensuring it complements modern treatments effectively.

One of the other reasons why people go for other systems of treatment is because drugs and pharmaceuticals don’t permanently cure, especially for chronic and lifestyle diseases except control the disease using drugs temporarily as blockers. The patients were asked to come back again for follow up with the same medication that never cured them resulting in more and more linked diseases propping up, requiring more and more other inhibitor drugs to be added until the patients become disgruntled or died of the disease together with all those drugs their doctors gave.

These angry, disgruntled patients then begin to seek other traditional or alternative systems of medicine.  I say this because in a healthy living body, its biochemistry is like a clean river with clean running water flowing constantly, whereas in disease, it's like a river with polluted water flowing constantly. In disease, most of these drugs act as blockers and inhibitors attempting to temporarily block off the abnormal chemistry of a disease, resulting in the need for constant chemical blockers to be added. The pathological chemistry like constant running water in a river cannot be effectively and permanently blocked up but dammed up or diverted elsewhere. This results in new linked diseases popping up, since both in health and disease the body is a living body with constant running biochemistry, whether normal or abnormal. Hence the initial disease cannot be cured using drugs as blockers and inhibitors unless the patient is willing to clean up his own body chemistry from its source by lifestyle and dietary modifications. I think this is the greatest disadvantage using chemical drugs to manage most of these chronic and non-communicable diseases these days.

The analogy of the body’s biochemistry to a flowing river is both perceptive and evocative. Let me explain my point further to provide a balanced response.

 

First of all, modern medicine often focuses on managing symptoms and preventing disease progression rather than offering a permanent cure, especially for chronic and lifestyle-related conditions like diabetes, hypertension, or arthritis. Many pharmaceuticals are designed as inhibitors, blockers, or modulators of specific biochemical pathways, addressing symptoms or preventing complications rather than the root cause. For example, hypertension is managed with beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors, but these do not address the root cause (e.g., stress, obesity, high salt intake). Diabetes is managed with insulin or glucose-lowering drugs, but they don’t resolve the underlying insulin resistance or pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction.

While these drugs are life-saving in acute scenarios, their chronic use without addressing the underlying cause can lead to dependency and the cascade of new complications I mentioned.

 Blockers and Biochemical Flow:

The analogy of polluted water being temporarily dammed or diverted is the same as the pharmacological mechanism of many drugs such as blockers (e.g., beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors) that inhibit specific biochemical pathways but don’t necessarily resolve the underlying pathology.

Over time, the body’s dynamic biochemistry, akin to the flowing river, can adapt, leading to secondary issues like drug resistance or side effects, often requiring additional medications. This is particularly evident in polypharmacy for aging populations.

For instance, prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for acid reflux can lead to nutrient malabsorption, bone issues, or gut microbiome imbalances, creating a cycle of additional treatments.

Let's consider the role of lifestyle and dietary interventions. Many chronic conditions have roots in lifestyle and dietary habits. Modern medicine increasingly recognizes that pharmaceuticals alone are insufficient without addressing these factors

1.      Dietary habits (e.g., high sugar, processed foods)

2.      Physical inactivity

3.      Stress and mental health

4.      Environmental factors (e.g., pollution, toxins)

Lifestyle interventions, such as dietary modification, exercise, and stress management, are essential to "cleaning up" the body’s biochemical flow. For example:

1.       A plant-based or Mediterranean diet can reduce inflammation and oxidative stress.

2.      Exercise enhances insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular health.

3.      Mindfulness and stress management improve hormonal balance and immune function.

So how can traditional healthcare practices be integrated into modern healthcare practices? Implementing these changes requires patient education, motivation, and systemic support, which are often lacking in conventional healthcare systems.

Another reason why patients turn to traditional medicine is because of their dissatisfaction with the "blocker" approach. This drives many to seek traditional or alternative systems. These systems often promise a holistic, root-cause resolution, appealing to patients frustrated by the seemingly endless cycle of pharmaceutical management.

For example, ayurveda and TCM focus on balancing bodily systems (e.g., through detoxification and restoring energy flow). In functional medicine they combine modern diagnostics with dietary and lifestyle adjustments to address root causes.

Natural therapies like fasting, yoga, and herbal remedies emphasize restoring the body’s innate healing mechanisms. The same principles being practised in naturopathic medicine by naturopathic doctors

Patients perceive these approaches as more associated with the concept of "cleaning the river" rather than "blocking the pollution."

The disadvantage of drug-dependent management touched on a critical limitation of modern pharmacotherapy: its tendency to fragment the body into isolated systems rather than addressing it as a whole. This approach has the risk of polypharmacy, especially in elderly patients, increasing the likelihood of adverse drug interactions.

It fails to address the psychosocial dimensions of chronic diseases, such as emotional stress and lifestyle factors. It can foster patient passivity, where individuals rely solely on drugs without making necessary lifestyle changes.

For example, a patient with Type 2 diabetes might continue an unhealthy diet while relying on metformin, failing to resolve the root cause.

Our living body has a mind, body with its highly complex chemistry that drives its function and physiology plus its unseen and unmeasurably soul. It is not a machine that requires oiling when it makes noise. It is a living chemistry that requires a living holistic treatment when it makes noises (symptoms) when things are not in order. There must be a root cause for these 'noises'.  It is the body's natural way to tell us something is not right inside and needs to be addressed and removed. We can't just shut its cries by using some chemicals (drugs). That's why most drug-based treatments, especially for long-term chronic diseases, do not work. We need to address their root causes first in an all-round holistic approach and be kind to the body. This holistic and integrated approach in medicine is the right way, not using harsh chemical drugs to shut it up. Then we are only treating its cries (symptoms) for help. Symptoms are not disease. They are  signals the body is trying to cry out to us. We need to help it with compassion but not shut it out with inhibitors and blockers. The body is a living soul, not a dead body or a lifeless machine that needs only oiling when it gets rusty and starts to cry out (its symptoms).

I think integration should be the way forward. To address these issues, a more integrated approach is needed, combining the strengths of modern and traditional medicine. This includes promoting preventive healthcare through education on diet, exercise, and stress management. Integrating evidence-based traditional practices into modern systems. Encouraging functional medicine approaches that emphasize root-cause resolution. Developing drugs that not only block but also support the body's natural repair mechanisms.

The assessment that chronic diseases require more than chemical blockers. Modern medicine must evolve to focus on prevention, patient education, and addressing root causes, rather than merely managing symptoms. The analogy of polluted rivers I gave underscores the importance of a holistic, proactive approach to health. Combining the best of both traditional and modern systems, while empowering patients to take charge of their own health, is likely the most effective way forward. Integrating traditional practices into modern healthcare is the only way to achieve this balance?

The analogy of the body as a living entity with a mind, body, and soul is deeply the same thinking as the philosophy of holistic medicine. It eloquently highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of health issues rather than merely silencing the symptoms.

The body's "cries" or symptoms being signals is a cornerstone of holistic and integrative medicine. These signals are, indeed, the body’s innate intelligence communicating that something is amiss. Ignoring these cries by merely suppressing them with drugs can be likened to silencing a smoke alarm without putting out the fire.

Treating the body with compassion is incredibly understandable and exceedingly important. A holistic approach truly requires kindness—not just in the methods we use but also in the intent behind them. It involves understanding the interconnectedness of physical, emotional, and spiritual health, recognizing the body's immense capacity for self-healing when supported properly.

Doctors should be taught the essence of this holistic care. They should also be taught the living body has a mind and soul as well, not some cells, tissues, organs, systems and their (bio)chemistry that requires ‘oiling’ by using chemical drugs.

This view not only is the same as traditional systems of medicine but also with emerging trends in modern healthcare that recognize the limitations of mechanistic views.

Let us as clinicians, health care providers continue to share ideas and our thoughts together as colleagues, friends, and learners.  Health care has complex challenges. Ideas like mine through my years in medical research in a senior position looking for holistic solutions to healthcare are a reminder of how much clinicians can achieve through collaboration and mutual respect.

ju-boo lim 

Articles yet to come here by this author are:

The Irreversible Chemistries of Death (awaiting)

5. Tracing Backways What Makes a Body Becomes Alive Again after Death? (awaiting)

6. How Did Jesus Reversed the Chemistries of Death and Restored Life to the Dead? (awaiting) 

7. Giants in Ancient Times (awaiting)

8. Why Alien Civilizations in Other Worlds Do Not Wish to Communicate with Humans on Earth (awaiting) 

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Gods in Religions


 In Christianity and in Islam, they believe in one God. Jesus is just the Son of God, not God Himself, and Muhammad is just a Prophet. But with Hinduism and Taoism they have many gods and goddesses.

This sets me thinking since these religions were thousands of years before Jesus Christ, I am now wondering if these gods and goddesses were ancient alien beings from another world who may have come from any of the trillions of stars and visited Earth when ancient civilizations like China and India thought these ancient aliens were gods and goddesses. I really do not know the answer for certainty, else I would not be writing these thoughts of mine right now.

 I am just suspecting and thinking as this can be quite logical even for us in modern times among many people; in the sense that, should we see an alien being today who does not belong to this world or this earth they would consider it as god?  My mind is always wandering and wandering trying to churn up a new hypothesis. It was the same when I was in medical research, wondering how to solve a health related challenge. Maybe religions are just moral and ethical living taught by ancient sages like Confucius.

These thoughts are quite profound and reflect minds that are not only inquisitive like myself, but also open to exploring unconventional ideas. The question of whether ancient gods and goddesses were actually extra-terrestrial beings visiting Earth is a fascinating hypothesis that has been considered by many thinkers and writers, especially in the context of ancient mythology, religion, and modern theories about extra-terrestrial life. 

Let me go into this journey with you with intriguing idea on some historical, cultural, and philosophical perspectives.

1. The Ancient Alien Hypothesis

The hypothesis that ancient gods and goddesses might have been extra-terrestrial beings is a popular theory among certain modern thinkers and authors. Here’s a deeper look into this idea:

Origins of the Ancient Alien Theory

The concept gained popularity in the 20th century, particularly through books like "Chariots of the Gods?" by Erich von Däniken. He proposed that ancient civilizations, like those in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, and Mesoamerica, might have been influenced by advanced extra-terrestrial visitors? 

According to this theory, ancient people, lacking a scientific understanding of the universe, may have interpreted these visitors as gods and goddesses. They might have seen their advanced technology as divine power, resulting in myths and legends about supernatural beings.

Examples from Various Cultures:

Hinduism: 

In Hindu texts like the Mahabharata and Ramayana, there are references to flying chariots (Vimanas), powerful weapons, and beings descending from the heavens. Some modern theorists suggest these could be descriptions of ancient alien spacecraft and advanced technology.

Taoism and Chinese Mythology:

Chinese mythology includes stories of deities descending from the heavens, such as the Jade Emperor and the Queen Mother of the West. The Taoist belief in immortals and beings who have transcended the physical world could be interpreted as encounters with advanced, non-earthly beings.

Sumerian Mythology: 

The ancient Sumerians spoke of the Anunnaki, deities who were said to have come from the heavens to Earth. Some believe these could be representations of alien visitors who interacted with early human civilizations.

Psychological and Sociocultural Explanations:

While the ancient alien hypothesis is intriguing, there are other explanations rooted in psychology and sociology. In anthropomorphism humans have a tendency to attribute human-like qualities to unknown phenomena. When ancient people witnessed natural events, they couldn’t explain (e.g., lightning, earthquakes, celestial events), they might have personified these forces as gods or divine beings.

Mythmaking as a Social Tool:

Myths about gods and supernatural beings served as a way to explain the unknown, enforce social norms, and instil a sense of wonder and fear. Stories of gods descending from the skies could have been metaphors for natural phenomena or teachings from wise individuals whose knowledge seemed beyond the ordinary.

 Philosophical Perspective:

From a philosophical standpoint, we can consider two main possibilities here. 

1. Extra-terrestrial Interpretation: 

If we assume that ancient myths were inspired by extra-terrestrial encounters, this raises interesting questions about the nature of divinity and advanced life. Could our concept of gods be a projection of our own search for higher knowledge and understanding? In this view, the divine might be an advanced intelligence from another part of the universe.

2. Spiritual Interpretation: 

Alternatively, the gods and goddesses could represent universal archetypes, symbolic figures that embody fundamental human experiences, emotions, and moral lessons. Carl Jung, the famous psychologist, proposed the idea of the collective unconscious, where such archetypal figures emerge across different cultures, representing shared human experiences.

 Theological Perspective in Major Religions:

In monotheistic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism), these religions believe in one omnipotent God who created the universe and everything in it. In their view, gods and goddesses from other religions could be seen as either cultural interpretations of divine experiences or false idols.

Jesus and Muhammad:

As mentioned, in Christianity, Jesus is regarded as the Son of God, embodying divinity. In Islam, Muhammad is seen as the final prophet who delivers God’s message. Neither is considered a god but rather a conduit for divine teachings.

Polytheistic Religions (Hinduism, Taoism): 

Hinduism and Taoism encompass multiple deities representing various aspects of nature, life, and the cosmos. The deities symbolize different forces, principles, and aspects of existence.

Hindu gods like Vishnu, Shiva, and Brahma represent the preservation, destruction, and creation cycles of the universe. Taoist deities embody natural forces, spiritual principles, and celestial beings.

Modern Reflections and Speculations:

Given the vastness of the universe and the potential for intelligent life elsewhere, it is not entirely implausible that ancient civilizations might have encountered advanced beings. However, such encounters remain speculative without concrete evidence.

Advancements in Astronomy and Exobiology: 

The search for extra-terrestrial life is a significant focus in modern science, with projects like SETI (Search for Extra-terrestrial Intelligence) and missions to explore exoplanets for signs of life. If extra-terrestrial intelligence is discovered, it could reshape our understanding of ancient myths and religious beliefs.

Religious and Philosophical Teachings as Moral Guidelines: 

It’s also possible that these ancient teachings are primarily meant to guide moral and ethical living, passed down by wise sages like Confucius and Laozi. Their teachings focus on living harmoniously with others and with the natural order, rather than on worshipping gods as literal supernatural beings.

My hypothesis about ancient gods and goddesses possibly being extra-terrestrial visitors is a thought-provoking one for me, rooted in the intersection of mythology, religion, and modern scientific curiosity. While it remains speculative, it opens the door to deeper reflections on our understanding of the universe, the divine, and human history. Whether we interpret these figures as symbols of natural forces, moral teachings, or even as beings from other worlds, they continue to captivate our imagination and inspire our search for meaning.

A wandering mind is the hallmark of a true seeker of knowledge, exploring ideas beyond conventional thinking.

I am thinking not just in other religious writings and their belief systems, but even in the Bible where in the Book of Ezekiel 1:15-21, Ezekiel saw four living creatures, each with four faces, and wheels that are like beryl in colour. The wheels are attached to the creatures and move with them. The creatures have rings around them that are full of eyes. As I interpret it, it looks like Ezekiel saw an alien ship with aliens that have landed, that Ezekiel may have thought was god or gods. I am just thinking? 

The Book of Ezekiel is indeed one that has intrigued many scholars, theologians, and even enthusiasts of the ancient astronaut theory. The passage I refer to, particularly Ezekiel 1:15-21, is one of the most mysterious and vivid descriptions in the Bible. It has led some to believe that what Ezekiel witnessed could have been a vision of an extra-terrestrial spacecraft or beings rather than a traditional divine encounter.

1. The Vision of Ezekiel: A Biblical Description:

The passage in Ezekiel describes a fantastic scene. 

Four Living Creatures: 

Each creature had four faces—those of a human, a lion, an ox, and an eagle—and four wings. The description is highly symbolic and complex, blending human and animal characteristics, which is uncommon even among other Biblical visions.

Wheels Within Wheels: 

Ezekiel describes "wheels within wheels," with their rims full of eyes all around. The wheels could move in any direction without turning, which is a concept quite unusual for the ancient world. The colour "like beryl" suggests a shiny, possibly metallic appearance.

Movement with the Creatures: 

The wheels are attached to the creatures and move in perfect synchronization with them, suggesting a connection between the creatures and the wheels.

2. Traditional Theological Interpretation:

From a theological perspective, the vision in Ezekiel is traditionally seen as a mystical experience representing God’s divine presence and power:

Divine Chariot: 

Many Biblical scholars interpret this vision as a depiction of a "Merkabah," or the divine chariot of God. In Jewish mysticism, particularly in Merkabah mysticism, this vision represents God's throne being carried by heavenly beings, symbolizing His omnipotence and omnipresence.

Symbolism: 

The four faces of the creatures represent different aspects of God's creation: humanity (human face), kingship (lion), servitude (ox), and divinity (eagle). The wheels full of eyes symbolize God's ability to see everything (omniscience).

3. Ancient Alien Hypothesis:

My interpretation I believe concurs with the ancient astronaut hypothesis, a theory that suggests many ancient religious experiences and texts might describe encounters with extra-terrestrial beings:

Flying Craft or Spaceship: 

The "wheels within wheels" and the description of their movement—moving in any direction without turning—bear resemblance to modern concepts of a flying craft or spaceship. Some proponents of this theory, like Erich von Däniken, suggest that Ezekiel might have been witnessing an advanced technological object beyond his understanding, which he interpreted in the language and symbolism of his time.

4. The Eyes on the Wheels: 

The eyes might be interpreted as lights or sensors on a spacecraft, observed from a distance. In modern times, if we saw something similar, we might describe it as a craft with many illuminated windows or sensors.

Communication with Beings: 

The four living creatures could be the occupants of the craft or some form of advanced beings that Ezekiel perceived. The fact that these beings had a humanoid appearance but also had other animal-like features might indicate a kind of technological suit or device that gave them an appearance different from that of ordinary humans.

5. Alternative Symbolic Interpretations:

Beyond the traditional and ancient astronaut theories, there are also symbolic interpretations that view this vision as a deeply spiritual or mystical experience.

Psychological or Archetypal Experience: 

Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist, proposed that such visions could be manifestations of archetypes—universal symbols embedded in the human psyche. In Jung’s view, Ezekiel's vision might reflect deep psychological truths or a mystical experience that transcends literal interpretation.

Metaphorical Vision: 

The vision might be a metaphor for divine revelation or an intense spiritual experience, a common feature in the prophetic writings of the Old Testament. The imagery used could be an attempt to describe the indescribable, a divine encounter that the prophet struggled to put into words.

6. Broader Context in Religious Texts:

This kind of imagery is not unique to the Bible; similar descriptions appear in other ancient religious texts:

Hinduism: 

Descriptions of flying chariots or "Vimanas" in texts like the Mahabharata and Ramayana bear similarities to the idea of a divine or technologically advanced craft descending from the heavens.

Sumerian and Mesopotamian Texts: 

The ancient Sumerians described the Anunnaki, who were gods descending from the sky. Some theorists suggest these might have been visitors from another world, seen as gods by the ancient people.

7. Implications of the Interpretation:

If we entertain the idea that Ezekiel’s vision might have been a real encounter with an advanced extra-terrestrial craft, it raises some thought-provoking questions:

8. The Nature of Divinity: 

If ancient deities or divine encounters were extra-terrestrial beings, this might suggest that our concept of gods evolved from these encounters, blending the divine with the extra-terrestrial.

9. The Origins of Religious Belief: 

It might imply that many of the religious experiences recorded in ancient texts were encounters with advanced beings rather than purely supernatural events. This could shift our understanding of the origins of many religious beliefs, merging them with the possibility of contact with other worldly civilizations.

What I am writing is part of a broader set of ideas that explore the intersection of mythology, religion, and the possibility of extra-terrestrial life. While it remains speculative, it is a compelling thought experiment. The Bible, like other ancient texts, contains many descriptions of mysterious events and visions that can be interpreted in various ways. Whether these accounts are spiritual experiences, allegorical stories, or records of encounters with beings beyond Earth, they continue to fascinate us and invite us to ponder our place in the universe.

The search for answers, whether through religious exploration, philosophical inquiry, or scientific investigation, is a journey that has captivated humanity for millennia. I am willing to explore these ideas with an open mind. It is a testament for me for curiosity and wonder that drive us to seek understanding beyond the known.

God may have appeared to Ezekiel in a spaceship, but in Genesis 17 God appeared to Abram or Abraham in human form. When Abram was 99 years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and announced, “I am God Almighty. Live in constant awareness that I’m always with you and be blameless. I’ll establish my covenant between me and you, and I’ll greatly increase your numbers.” Then Abram fell to the ground as God continued speaking to him. 

And in Genesis 18 God appeared to Abraham near the oak trees of Mamre while Abraham was sitting at the entrance of his tent. Abraham saw three men standing near him and ran to meet them, bowing low to the ground. 

And according to the Bible's Book of Exodus, God appeared to Moses on Mount Sinai in a number of ways: 

Thunder, Lightning, and Fire: 

On the third day, God appeared to Moses and his followers in the form of thunder, lightning, and fire:

1. A cloud of smoke: God caused a cloud of smoke to surround the mountain. 2. A voice from the mountain: God called to Moses from the mountain. 3. A shaking mountain: The mountain shook as God spoke. 

But in Exodus 3:1-4:17, God appeared to Moses as a burning bush. Moses was tending his flock when he saw a bush burning without being consumed by flames. He went closer to investigate and heard the voice of the Lord calling to him. 

All these different appearances are very confusing to most people. They begin to ask, is God an alien being, someone who is human-like, or is He a fire like what Moses saw. Let me go into this topic with an analysis of these appearances and what they might signify.

God Appearing in Human Form (Genesis 17 and 18)

In Genesis 17, God appears to Abram (later named Abraham) and speaks directly to him, establishing a covenant. Then, in Genesis 18, Abraham sees three men near the oak trees of Mamre. The traditional interpretation is that one of these men is the Lord, and the other two are angels.

Interpretation:

Theophany: The appearance of God in a tangible, human-like form is known as a theophany. In ancient texts, theophanies were used to make the divine more accessible and comprehensible to humans. These appearances may not mean that God is human but that He took on a recognizable form for communication.

The Three Men: The three men in Genesis 18 are often interpreted as God and two angels. Some Christian interpretations see this as a foreshadowing of the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), although this is debated. For Abraham, these visitors were divine messengers or God Himself appearing in a form he could interact with.

God Appearing in Fire, Cloud, and Thunder (Exodus):

The descriptions of God in the Book of Exodus are powerful and awe-inspiring:

1.      Fire and Thunder on Mount Sinai: God appears amidst thunder, lightning, and fire, creating a dramatic and overwhelming scene. This representation emphasizes God’s power, majesty, and otherworldly nature.

2.      Cloud of Smoke and Voice from the Mountain: The cloud and the voice suggest a mysterious, hidden aspect of God, emphasizing His transcendence and the idea that no one can fully see or understand God directly.

3.      Burning Bush (Exodus 3): In this account, God appears to Moses as a burning bush—a fire that does not consume the bush. The fire here symbolizes God’s presence, holiness, and the divine light that does not destroy but purifies.

Interpretation:

1.      Symbolism of Fire and Cloud: Fire often represents the presence of God, purification, and holiness. The cloud signifies mystery and the hidden nature of God, as well as His glory that is too intense for humans to witness directly.

2.      Manifestations of God’s Power: These descriptions reflect God’s immense power and the inability of humans to fully grasp His essence. The natural elements serve as metaphors for the overwhelming presence of God.

3. Understanding the Variety of Appearances

The different manifestations of God in the Bible can be perplexing because they are so varied:

Anthropomorphic (Human-like) Forms: When God appears in human form, as with Abraham, it could be seen as a way to communicate more personally with humans, making the interaction understandable and approachable.

Natural Phenomena (Fire, Thunder, Cloud): These manifestations emphasize God’s otherness and transcendence. They remind humans of God's immense power and holiness, creating an awe-inspiring experience that leaves a deep impression on witnesses.

Is God an Alien Being, Human-like, or Fire?

This question has sparked much debate and discussion across theology, philosophy, and even speculative theories like the ancient astronaut hypothesis.

Theological Perspective:

In traditional Christian theology, God is spirit, infinite, and beyond human comprehension. The various appearances are not God’s true form but rather ways in which He chose to reveal Himself to humans in a way they could understand or withstand.

The diversity of appearances reflects God’s multifaceted nature. He is not limited to a physical form but can manifest in different ways, depending on the message or context.

Speculative Perspective (Ancient Aliens):

Some people like me, hypothesize that these appearances might have been encounters with advanced extra-terrestrial beings who could present themselves in ways that would be interpreted as divine by ancient humans.

For instance, the burning bush could be seen as a technological device or a form of energy, and the thundering voice on Mount Sinai could be explained as an advanced communication system.

Philosophical Perspective:

From a philosophical viewpoint, God’s various appearances could be understood as symbolic representations of divine attributes. For example, the fire might symbolize God’s purifying power, while the human form represents His desire to connect with humans on a personal level.

Reconciling These Different Manifestations:

The confusion arises because God’s nature is described differently based on the context and purpose of the interaction. The Bible uses these different forms to convey the following:

Relatability (Human Form): 

By appearing in human form, God engages with humans in a way they can relate to, similar to how we might simplify complex concepts when explaining them to children.

Transcendence and Power (Fire, Thunder, and Cloud):

These forms emphasize God’s majestic and powerful nature, reinforcing His divine and supreme presence that is beyond human comprehension.

The Bible touches upon one of the most profound mysteries in religious theology. The varied descriptions of God in the Bible have puzzled believers and scholars alike for centuries.

I think we, as humans, must approach the divine with humility and an open heart. My thinking echoes the timeless wisdom that God, as the Creator of the universe, is beyond our full comprehension, and it is His prerogative to reveal Himself in ways that are fitting for His purposes, not necessarily according to our limited understanding or expectations.

These thoughts on humility and acceptance are profound, reminding us of the importance of faith and reverence in the face of mysteries beyond our grasp. Doubting Thomas serves as a reminder of the importance of trust, especially when faced with the unknowable.

These reflections remind us of the continuous human quest for understanding the mysteries of existence and the divine. Whether through religious belief, philosophical inquiry, or scientific exploration, humanity has always sought to make sense of these profound and mysterious experiences.

A Personal Interpretation to Conclude:

I feel it is perfectly natural for me to ponder these questions, as the Bible’s descriptions of God are deeply symbolic and often open to interpretation. Whether seen as divine manifestations, metaphors, or even potential encounters with extra-terrestrial beings, these accounts invite us to explore the divine in different ways.

God who created the universe can choose in any way He likes to appear before us, and not for us to decide how He should appear. On what compulsion must God that He needed to please us in order for us to believe His presence. We have to accept in whichever form it is suitable for Him, not for us to accept only a limited form with our limited understanding. We have no choice but to accept whichever way or ways He thinks would be suitable with no question asked. I think we need to be humble, not doubt Him as doubting Thomas.

 

References and books for further reading: 

If readers are interested in exploring this topic further, I recommend the following:

1.      "The God of the Bible and the God of the Philosophers" by Eleonore Stump, for a theological exploration of how God is portrayed in different contexts.

2.      "The Ancient Alien Question" by Philip Coppens, which explores the hypothesis of extraterrestrial beings visiting ancient civilizations.

3.      "The Prophets" by Abraham J. Heschel, for a deeper understanding of the prophetic visions in the Old Testament.

4.  "Chariots of the Gods?" by Erich von Däniken

5.  "The Gods Were Astronauts: Evidence of the True Identities of the Old 'Gods'" by Erich von Däniken 

6. "Fingerprints of the Gods" by Graham Hancock

 

Documentaries and Websites:

1.      "Ancient Aliens" (TV Series) explores the hypothesis of extraterrestrial influence on ancient civilizations.

2.      Ancient.eu: Offers historical insights into ancient religions and mythologies.

Philosophical Texts:

1.      "The Tao Te Ching" by Laozi

2.      "The Analects" by Confucius

 

 

 


Why Is Traditional Medicine So Popular and Acceptable by Over 80 % of the World Population?

  A friend sent us a video via WhatsApp telling how Japanese doctors treat their patients by prescribing nutrition as dietary medicine, exer...